This is really sad. The worst form of plagiarism. You copied and repainted someone else's design. Not only that, but the design you copied is one of the stock planes. Stop posting garbage and maybe you'll start getting some points.😤
@corey1324 Hey kid. I see that you're new to this game. For many planes, YOU have to be the one to pull up. Most planes in real life require YOU, the pilot to pull up. Once you get in the air, I believe you'll realize that this is both a realistic and fun plane to fly!😅
The plane was designed to be touchy. The Firefox is being designed by russians to be the F22's rival. Like most russian fighters have been for a few decades, it includes supermaneuverability. In the description, i made note of the fact that it was a bit unstable. However, you must keep in mind that to be agile, an aircraft must posses an unstable airframe. To maintain stable flight on these unstable airframes, the Fly-By-Wire system in used. Quite frankly, without some sory of stabilizing computer, it's gonna remain unstable. That can't be helped. As for the fuel. The wings are segmented to provide strength, which allows gor high G turns. They are so strong that the only time they fell off was when i dived, hit 1300 mph and pulled up at 1500 ft. This also means that I really can't carry all that much fuel in the wings. As for higher top speed, you said yourself that it has a top speed of 850. The firefox can hit 1150, while still gaining altitude. Neither of these planes are bad, but i just felt like any shortcomings deserved justification. As for the wings, they look that way, because that's how they look on the real thing.@thelonewolf427
I'm not talking about u using Authros's design as a foundation. I'm talking about you rating yourself. Don't do it. If your design is really good, then people will cone to you@Aaronlin
Meh, my Sukhoi PAK FA T-50 Firefox could do all this except better. Mine Can dive from 70K, reach speeds in excess of 1150 mph when flying normally and doesn't break in Medium settings. That dive you did? I did that, but i pulled up at 1K ft. Honestly, i've seen better, but not a bad try at all
Are you sure. This isn't even a complete model, so it's capabilities will be limited. If your plane is finished, then there isn't really a comparison. Finished vs Incomplete? I don't think so@Sabro
Its's the pitching. The controversy l surfaces on the wings counteract the ones on the tail and cause it to take forever to turn. Speed was good, but pitching is very important@Skylake
Now i feel like you beta users are just rubbin' salt on the wound. Comin' in here which your fancy prototype walkers and what not. Pretty soon you'll all be walkin' here with those new-fangled AT-ST whatchamacallits!
I found this extremely satisfying to fly. It might not be beautiful, but it makes up in sheer performance. Rivals some of the forward swept wing models.
Love these things
Simply lovely
Sure @WalrusAircraft
Not bad. Looks leave a lot to be desired, but not bad. I also made one of these, but I named it "Bright Knight"
I didn't think you were. Great minds think alike@Cedy117
This is really sad. The worst form of plagiarism. You copied and repainted someone else's design. Not only that, but the design you copied is one of the stock planes. Stop posting garbage and maybe you'll start getting some points.😤
Doesn't even look like a komet
@corey1324 Hey kid. I see that you're new to this game. For many planes, YOU have to be the one to pull up. Most planes in real life require YOU, the pilot to pull up. Once you get in the air, I believe you'll realize that this is both a realistic and fun plane to fly!😅
@ElijtheGeat ...ACTUALLY, i made the rapier first... Kinda like when i published my avro arrow, this guy made one shortly thereafter...
It's not a jet. It's a rocket interceptor
Also more points for me
More points for me. Pretty much a repainted copy 😑
Wow...just wow
@Carre You need a brain. It's president's day in the US.
I agree
Love it
Copying is not cool
Budget cuts? @ElijtheGeat
Lol @Nassassin #getRekt
Glad i could be of use. I LANDED IT ON THE USS JUNDROO!!!
Thanks. @SpiritusRaptor
Seeya@thelonewolf427
What? It does 1150 for me. Your newest plane can't even hit 1,000 mph, or at least it doesn't operate that way on my device
The plane was designed to be touchy. The Firefox is being designed by russians to be the F22's rival. Like most russian fighters have been for a few decades, it includes supermaneuverability. In the description, i made note of the fact that it was a bit unstable. However, you must keep in mind that to be agile, an aircraft must posses an unstable airframe. To maintain stable flight on these unstable airframes, the Fly-By-Wire system in used. Quite frankly, without some sory of stabilizing computer, it's gonna remain unstable. That can't be helped. As for the fuel. The wings are segmented to provide strength, which allows gor high G turns. They are so strong that the only time they fell off was when i dived, hit 1300 mph and pulled up at 1500 ft. This also means that I really can't carry all that much fuel in the wings. As for higher top speed, you said yourself that it has a top speed of 850. The firefox can hit 1150, while still gaining altitude. Neither of these planes are bad, but i just felt like any shortcomings deserved justification. As for the wings, they look that way, because that's how they look on the real thing.@thelonewolf427
I'm not talking about u using Authros's design as a foundation. I'm talking about you rating yourself. Don't do it. If your design is really good, then people will cone to you@Aaronlin
You'd better not rate this one too...
Meh, my Sukhoi PAK FA T-50 Firefox could do all this except better. Mine Can dive from 70K, reach speeds in excess of 1150 mph when flying normally and doesn't break in Medium settings. That dive you did? I did that, but i pulled up at 1K ft. Honestly, i've seen better, but not a bad try at all
Absolute crap! I hate when people do this. They obscure the good designs with generally less impressive designs
Why can't that beta for iOS come out already😫😩😖I NEED THIS PLANE!!!
Made in China, Designed in Russia! LOL...JK
Are you sure. This isn't even a complete model, so it's capabilities will be limited. If your plane is finished, then there isn't really a comparison. Finished vs Incomplete? I don't think so@Sabro
Absolutely awesome. I'm happy that you were able to fix that excellent design!!!
@doppleherz you do know this is sn outdated design, right?
Its's the pitching. The controversy l surfaces on the wings counteract the ones on the tail and cause it to take forever to turn. Speed was good, but pitching is very important@Skylake
I'm actually salivating because of this. No lie!
Maybe if you fly far enough, you'll find treasure island!
Now i feel like you beta users are just rubbin' salt on the wound. Comin' in here which your fancy prototype walkers and what not. Pretty soon you'll all be walkin' here with those new-fangled AT-ST whatchamacallits!
Wayyyy too slow for my taste, but that exterior is just too cool
Here are those 3 5 star rating to whoever diagnosed the problem
You know, @Authros , it was your Su-37 Terminator and its high level of performance that inspired my idea to build this plane
I can't even use this plane and i'm sweating at the thought of using it.
I just pulled up from a 70 degree dive at the speed of 1240 mph below 1,000 ft without thrust vectoring and suffered no damage!!!
Quit cheating. You can't use alternate accounts to rate your own planes
And so it begins...
Tell me, exactly what kind of fighter is this?
Great idea
@doppleherz @Ditto so are you two gonna tell me why it gets 3 stars?
I found this extremely satisfying to fly. It might not be beautiful, but it makes up in sheer performance. Rivals some of the forward swept wing models.
It's not too often that one finds a correctly colored rainbow harrier
Nice