Profile image

Shnippy Co. “Snapper” fighter jet

13.7k Shnippy  3.9 years ago

(Everything tested on high physics!)
The newest addition to the Shnippy Co. Air Force to replace the Shnippy Co. fighter jet, we proudly introduce you to the Shnippy Co. “Snapper” fighter jet! The name “Snapper” originates from the jets ability to snap it’s nose upwards suddenly and return without losing control, all without the help of gyroscopes! This plane is also more stable and less dangerous to land than our previous fighter jet.

Functions/Controls:
Ag1: ejection seat (Thanks to @spefyjerbf and @An2k for supplying me with the funky trees code to delay the deployment of the parachutes!):

Ag2: night vision:

Ag3+pitch up: engages the ability to snap upwards (also activates the snapper missile):

AG4: dump all your missiles:

Ag5: arresting hook:

Ag6: turns on anti collision lights for nighttime or foggy formation flying:

Normal flight controls

Yaw for front gear steering:

Brake for gear brakes and air brakes:

Weapons and defence:
One mini gun that shoots 25 rounds a second with a 50 round burst and white tracers:

6 Guardian missiles:

2 Interceptor missiles:

1 Snapper missile:

And a ton of flares to turn those missiles away:

Unit cost in Canadian dollars: 600 000

I do apologize for the quality of the gifs and the fact that I probably added to many. Anyways, I hope you enjoy this! Stay healthy and I’ll see you next time!

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 28.3ft (8.6m)
  • Length 31.2ft (9.5m)
  • Height 13.6ft (4.1m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 10,306lbs (4,675kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 3.27
  • Wing Loading 38.4lbs/ft2 (187.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 268.4ft2 (24.9m2)
  • Drag Points 2685

Parts

  • Number of Parts 77
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 501
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    13.7k Shnippy

    @Altmztrn thanks for the upvote!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.7k Shnippy

    Hmmm, interesting. And thanks for the upvote! @An2k

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,182 An2k

    Have tried on debugger variable " GForce " (not tried with verticalG yet) with interesting results most of the time with chute deloyment @ 1000 kph GForce=9 but some instances got GForce 81-91

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Shnippy
    np

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.7k Shnippy

    @ArcturusAerospace @Cabbage17 @tylerdeveneuxmusic @scratch thank you all for the upvotes!

    +2 3.9 years ago