Auto Credit Based on qazedcujmyhn's Fokker 100
This is an aircraft painted in Air Transport World colors.
Thanks to qazedctgnujm for the plane.
Airplane
The Fokker 100 is a regional jet that was produced by Fokker in the Netherlands. The Fokker 100 was based on the Fokker F28 with a fuselage stretched by 5.7 m (18.8 ft) to seat up to 109 passengers, up from 85. It is powered by two newer Rolls-Royce Tay turbofans, and it has an updated glass cockpit and a wider wing and tail for increased maximum weights. The Fokker 70 is a shortened variant that can seat up to 85 passengers and was developed for shorter routes, which first flew in April of 1993.
(From Wikipedia)
Thank you for watching.
I'm using a translation. Apologies if there are any mistakes.
Specifications
Spotlights
- IMVICTOR 17 days ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Fokker 100
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 92.9ft (28.3m)
- Length 123.3ft (37.6m)
- Height 29.0ft (8.9m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 65,300lbs (29,619kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.361
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.045
- Wing Loading 31.3lbs/ft2 (153.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 2,083.5ft2 (193.6m2)
- Drag Points 7765
Parts
- Number of Parts 500
- Control Surfaces 9
- Performance Cost 2,598
@Happythe1th That's why I said I won't write it. Do as you like. It's up to you if you want to use my plane.
P.S.: Please do not post multiple comments.
@Happythe1th When is this going to end? Enough already.
Still!
@Happythe1th That community and this one are different communities. This post is not about talking about the accident and lamenting it.
Also if I'm commenting too much then stop writing comments longer than a 2 hour tutorial
Have you seen a youtuber get attacked by controversy over recreating a plane crash?
@Happythe1th Are you 9 years old? So what? I barely understand English.
I'm 9! You duffer
OK then ,I wont use any of your planes anymore
U good
U go9d
Did I say something to you?
Ruok?
Has that happened to u before
I meant cared
Many users said that and no one care at all
@Happythe1th Writing about aircraft accidents almost always leads to controversy. There's no need to create unnecessary controversy. Also, just as I can't influence your posting style, you can't influence my style or force me to make corrections. If I think your opinion is wise, I'll write about it. However, in my opinion, your opinion doesn't fit my current style, so I won't write about the accident in the description. No amount of criticism will change that.
And please don't make me write anymore sentences. It's a pain to open the translation every time.
Also, I don't fully understand English and I don't want to write any more stupid sentences.
Finally: If I am attacking you and writing these comments in the heat of the moment, that is wrong. These comments are not an attack on you for no reason. I am not writing about it. I have my own opinions and I write based on logic, but the translation process may have made it unpleasant for you.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Still,putting that in the description would be smarter.
@Happythe1th I know people have their own opinions, and I respect that. But this is my post, and I get to decide what to write. I used to write about accidents, but I've changed my mind. If you want to talk about an accident on the site, create your own post and include it under your own rules. I won't complain about it unless it's too rude, disrespectful, or offensive.
INCLUDE THE REASON THEN!
@Happythe1th I shouldn't talk too much about aircraft accidents on this site, and this post is not about the accident, I just wanted to create a TAM livery.
P.S. Also, there is no need to write about the accident in the description section without a particular reason.
Hello, why aren't you talking about the thing I mentioned
Well you should've mentioned that in the description🤦♂️
@Happythe1th I've heard of it. Yes, it's this paint job. You're free to recreate it, but when you share it with the world in a video or something, please be respectful of the accident and the people involved.