Alright ! now its time for the most agile plane in my arsenal !.
This aircraft is called XF-156B Block B - Fighting Canary or Experimental Fighter Project Number 1 Version 5.6B Block B Codenamed Fighting Canary. This aircraft is a light fighter branched from the first experimental fighter project. It is agile enough to out-maneuver any common fighter aircraft.
```
Specification :
Performance
Top Speed (Loaded)
-High Altitude : 719 - 1028 mph / 625 - 893 kts (w/wo Afterburner)
-Low Altitude : 652 - 938 mph / 566 - 815 kts (w/wo Afterburner)
Stall Speed : 140 mph / 121 kts (starting to out of control when sharp turn)
Take-off Speed : 178 mph / 155 kts
360deg Turn : 9.5s
Load-out
Standard Load-out
- 2x Guardian Missile
- 3x Interceptor Missile
- 1x Minigun
Countermeasures : 1 (1x Bottom)
Fuel Capacity : 385 gal
Total Weight : 13080 lbs
Technology & Wildcards
=> Afterburner
The aircraft is equipped with afterburner thus, increasing its top speed tremendously.
=> Gyroscopic Stability
This will make the aircraft more stable in supersonic flight. The gyroscope is placed behind CoL.
Controls
AG5 : as Afterburner
AG6 : as Gyroscope
AG8 : as Lights
Trim : as Trim
VTOL : as Flaps
Note : This measurements might be a little bit inaccurate due to lack of tools.
```
Pros & Cons
Pros
+ Agile, long turning time but short turn radius
+ Countermeasures holds 80 flares
+ Fast for a light fighter (w/Afterburner)
Cons
- Extremely low fuel capacity, afterburner drains the fuel really quick
- Unstable around stall speed
- Slow without the afterburner
Okay so this is the most maneuverable aircraft in my arsenal, what do you guys think ? is it good or bad ?. You can leave your thoughts in the comment below :).
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 30.1ft (9.2m)
- Length 34.4ft (10.5m)
- Height 11.2ft (3.4m)
- Empty Weight 10,490lbs (4,758kg)
- Loaded Weight 13,079lbs (5,932kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 12.027
- Wing Loading 33.3lbs/ft2 (162.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 392.7ft2 (36.5m2)
- Drag Points 1937
Parts
- Number of Parts 106
- Control Surfaces 18
- Performance Cost 507
@StallFlight i see, thanks for the tip !
Here's a tip:
Make sure the rear landing gear is not too far back. I needs to be right behind the CoM. If it's too far back it'll be very hard to rotate when taking off since it's not allowing the rear of the aircraft to go down (so your nose won't get up). Eventually you will gain enough speed and lift to rotate, but it's just more convenient to place it right behind the CoM.
;)
@Windworn welcome
@AviownCorp Thanks :D