Profile image

Flying Beast

157 OscarLima  3.9 years ago
56 downloads
No Tags

Be very carefully with pushing the nose down. You get negativ AOA Stalls very easy and end up in uncontrollable flight situations.

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 37.1ft (11.3m)
  • Length 27.8ft (8.5m)
  • Height 14.0ft (4.3m)
  • Empty Weight 15,500lbs (7,030kg)
  • Loaded Weight 17,738lbs (8,045kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.633
  • Wing Loading 43.7lbs/ft2 (213.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 405.7ft2 (37.7m2)
  • Drag Points 2022

Parts

  • Number of Parts 100
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 697
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima sure! I will take a look

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Mustang51 thank you :)
    I have a new Version of the flying beast. Can you give me some feed back?

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima what’s also useful is changing the drag of your aircraft. If you look at my last post, you’ll see that I dramatically reduced the drag points to reach a realistic acceleration and maximum speed

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima SP doesn’t actually have CoG. It has CoM which is actually something else. It’s close to the CoG usually but still isn’t exactly the same.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Mustang51 yeah fore example the calculations fore the CoG is wrong. I Made my own equasions fore Calculations fore CoL amd CoG and they work and SP does not Match there. But at least it feels some cind of realistic

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima no problem! SP is pretty good for physics but a lot of times it gets stuff wrong (understandably) so real physics and SP stuff don’t always match hahaha.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Mustang51 thank you fore all this advices XD
    I worked alot of my nollage about this Physiks here on my own and i think i ll keep it with this. And ofcourse it is easy to fly instabile planes. that is the thing i focus on in SP. But because you realy have to be concentrated to fly these Things a havend published them. The omg 69 is actually a Version of one But i Made it "aerodynamikly stabil" in a way it does not stall that easyly. And thank you fore the tips again :)

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima that one is also significantly lighter than this plane. Where you should put the CoM varies for each aircraft and for that one it’s the perfect spot since it can still turn smoothly without any bumps or stalls. Of course it also depends on what kind of plane you’re making and how you want it to fly. If you’re interested in fly by wire though definitely take a look at the funky trees builds since they actually work and you can easily fly unstable aircraft. It’s very cool!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Mustang51 you have a Point there. But I actually disingn my aircrafts like this becaue I like to be "my Own fly by wire System". I think it is fun to fly instabile planes and get the best out of them. But at least this is not what the people in SP whant to have so i will make a more stabile Version.
    Look at my omg 69... the CoL amd CoG are very close to each other. The olny way it is stabilised is an aerodynamik way. If the CoL od CoG would be farer away you could not pull AoAs of 40 deg.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima it still needs to be a bit more in front of the CoL. It will actually be more manoeuvrable and turn smoother (resulting in shorter time to complete one turn). For a plane to fly and have high agility while unstable, it needs a fly by wire system but this doesn’t have it. It is possible to make this in SP with funky trees but you need to input different command lines to rotators and hinges which is fairly complex. Of course you can build your planes however you want but this is something that definitely would improve flight performance

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Mustang51 i what to have the CoL and CoG that close together. Otherwise it will be very unmanuverbale with all the Bombs. I build my aircrafts in a way that you CAN fly it very agil and not easy. It is hard to fly it good but it is possible. You just have to know how the aircraft flys and reacts to your inputs. But thank you fore the tip :)

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima also a small tip to help with making it fly better is to put the CoM further from the CoL. I would also recommend building with fuselage blocks instead of these ones. The fuselage parts are easier to shape and can hold extra fuel and weight. If you remove the fuel from the wing parts towards the back of this plane, it will fly much better :)

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Mustang51 me to 😂

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Seeras thank you

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    @OscarLima I’m glad you got that fixed :)

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    Mod Seeras

    Next to the download counter is a down facing arrow.
    Click on it and then you can change your creations description via the "edit" button.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    157 OscarLima

    @Mustang51 how can I change the Name?

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.4k Mustang51

    Just to let you know, this sort of title isn’t really appropriate for SP (as per the rules). I’d recommend you change the name and check out the rules page before a mod sees this and takes it down

    +1 3.9 years ago