Profile image

Curtiss XP-10

34.4k IntoTheDesignatedGridZone  1.9 years ago

The Curtiss XP-10 was a biplane fighter aircraft for use by the United States Army Air Corps for a fighter aircraft with high degree of maneuvrability. First flown on 1928, however, it didn't met its required specifications, was underpowered and plagued by engineering problems, especially about the cooling system of the engine led to its cancellation.

Design and development

(copied from Wikipedia and proofread)

The XP-10 was intended to be fast and maneuverable enough to win a dogfight. The XP-10 used a gull wing top wing, joined at the fuselage; this offered much better pilot visibility than the traditional biplane configuration. Coincidentally, this also permitted the wing and fuselage to meet at the optimum angle for minimizing drag. The wings were plywood-covered (rather than doped fabric, as used in World War I), and the fuselage was fabric-covered steel tubing.

The XP-10 used a 600 hp (447 kW) Curtiss V-1570-15 Conqueror water-cooled V12 engine. To overcome the drag of a radiator (a quite serious issue before the introduction of ethylene glycol), Curtiss incorporated it into the upper wing. It was formed of corrugated brass sheets through which cooling water was run. While ingenious, this introduced technical and mechanical problems, especially vulnerability to enemy fire in a combat aircraft.

In-game

The XP-10 as built had major three problems:
1. The wingspan (9.7 m) was shorter than the real wingspan (10 m), 0.3 meters short.
2. The length was about .1 meter longer (7.2 m) from the original specification (7.1 m)
3. The sides of the windshield are not detailed as seen from the blueprint.

Operational service

Delivered to the Army Air Corps in August 1928, the XP-10 first flew in September. Despite excellent manoeuvrability, with the XP-10 proving superior to the Curtiss Hawk in testing [n 1], persistent problems with cooling and the plumbing of the surface radiator led to the XP-10 being abandoned.

Specifications (in-game)

Length: 7.2 m
Wingspan: 9.7 m
Height: 3.1 m
Engine: Curtiss Conqueror, 600 hp.
Propellers: 2-bladed fixed pitch

Maximum speed: 316 km/h TAS near sea level
Cruise speed: 260 km/h TAS near sea level
Stall speed: ~95 km/h TAS near sea level
Climb rate: 572.66 meters per minute
Range:
Service ceiling: 8,100 meters

Armament: 2x MG

Gallery

acro
An XP-10 doing an inverted maneuver over the Holy Lyre-class airship Skyward.
front
The same thing but in front view, taken by a photographer from a Berliner Joyce P-16 who was escorting the airship.
cockpit
Alright for VR people.
The left lever is the throttle lever, right side is the trim lever, and the pedals are for yaw. Pressing two of them with your feet, especially on the ground, brakes the plane.


Notes

[n 1] There are Curtisses P-1, P-2, P-3, P-5, P-6, all of them bearing the name of 'Hawk'. Based on specifications, the XP-10 is superior than the P-1, P-2, P-3 and P-5 but slightly subpar than the P-6.


Anomalocaris

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 31.7ft (9.7m)
  • Length 23.5ft (7.2m)
  • Height 10.2ft (3.1m)
  • Empty Weight 3,033lbs (1,376kg)
  • Loaded Weight 3,976lbs (1,803kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.15
  • Wing Loading 10.2lbs/ft2 (49.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 389.3ft2 (36.2m2)
  • Drag Points 2318

Parts

  • Number of Parts 393
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 1,238
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @AnOmalOcaris I don’t have ones for the 18 and 19 because they didn’t exist

    Pinned 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    You wouldn’t happen to have a navy blue hardcover book with every fighter in numerical order would you lol

    Pinned 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnOmalOcaris nice nice

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345

    Announcement

    Curtisses XP-18 and XP-19 will be skipped, adding NAA YF-93 and Lockheed F-94 in the process.

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 (late reply)
    You can send me their drawings if you can.
    (I'm busy building another aircraft)

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,693 ShocK69

    Nc

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Adding a VR/cockpit tag since it has a cockpit

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 When a picture of those two exists, I'll build them—

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnOmalOcaris I have no clue if it’s even around anymore, it was my grandpa’s and he gave it to me

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 mhm

    progress hampers due to library being far away (school library exists) so depends on online references

    (sorry for off topic, should have been chatted in private)

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnOmalOcaris yeah it’s a little weird. The book is called US Fighters btw

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 And yeah

    I'm finding an online reference for these two mystery planes
    And i don't have that 'hardback book thing' (sorry if off-topic)

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 And I'm starting to visualise it by mind (even just only the side view)

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnOmalOcaris yeah the XP-19 was a low wing monoplane but nothing else was really determined, not even dimensions

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345
    Maybe to the forums I think (thanks)
    All I know is
    XP-18 — fighter biplane, Wright V-1560
    XP-19 — fighter monoplane, Wright V-1560

    wait my chatting area shrank

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Oh actually I don’t there were just intended configurations

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnOmalOcaris I do actually have blueprints for those two

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 Except for the Curtisses XP-18 and XP-19

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AnOmalOcaris oh boy I have a full book of everything from P-1 to F-111 and then FJ-1 to YF-17. It’s pretty old but it’s kinda cool because it’s got blueprints for a lot of experimental aircraft

    +1 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 Paperback notebooks only good for side view schematics

    and there's 25 of them

    1.9 years ago