North American XF-51 "Stallion"
Born from the experimental fervor of the mid-1950s, the North American XF-51 "Stallion" was an ambitious attempt to marry the proven airframe of the P-51 Mustang with the raw power of the emerging jet age. By repurposing the iconic Mustang fuselage and extending the nose to house a devastating 40mm autocannon flanked by twin 20mm cannons, engineers created a unique "pusher" silhouette powered by side-by-side axial-flow turbojets salvaged from captured German technology. The addition of forward-mounted canards was intended to offset the weight of the reinforced nose and provide superior pitch authority, giving the Stallion a distinct, aggressive profile that stood in stark contrast to the sleek, swept-wing designs beginning to populate the United States Air Force inventory.
Despite its formidable appearance on the tarmac at Edwards Air Force Base, the Stallion became a cautionary tale of "transitional" engineering, famously failing to meet nearly all its performance specifications. The drag produced by the straight-wing configuration fought against the thrust of the engines, leaving the aircraft perpetually underpowered and unable to reach supersonic speeds. However, its failure was a boon for science; the Stallion served as a vital high-speed testbed that helped engineers decode the "Mach tuck" phenomenon and the complexities of longitudinal stability in canard-equipped aircraft. While it never saw combat, the data harvested from the XF-51’s turbulent flight tests directly informed the design of later century-series fighters, ensuring that the "Mustang’s Jet Brother" left a lasting legacy on the frontier of aerospace history.

Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Simple but cool challenge! [OPEN]
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 44.6ft (13.6m)
- Length 52.5ft (16.0m)
- Height 15.8ft (4.8m)
- Empty Weight 13,516lbs (6,130kg)
- Loaded Weight 23,011lbs (10,437kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 2.021
- Wing Loading 33.1lbs/ft2 (161.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 694.9ft2 (64.6m2)
- Drag Points 6923
Parts
- Number of Parts 72
- Control Surfaces 6
- Performance Cost 395
@MsMuseumJanitor thanks man
@Pakdaaircraftindustries understandable. I'll chill for a while then since the contest is still early
@MsMuseumJanitor man the rating system broke when dudes obliterated the challenge
@Pakdaaircraftindustries is there still some negotiation room for me to squeeze in? what if you allow fusalage wings but you need to deduct 0.2 - 0.5 in all categories of the rating system?
@Pakdaaircraftindustries, nevermind actually I'll just post it normally since you clearly stated it
"It can't have a VR cockpit or custom fuselage wings! Neither it can have Custom weapons (you can change the name and parameters of the default weapons)"
@MsMuseumJanitor man please TS is actually going to end up really bad...
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I'm actually thinking of posting another one since it's part of the rules. also thanks for the good rating, I hope I can still exploit thee loopholes again ;)
Rating :
Looks : 9.5/10
Accuracy : 8.7/10
Works : 8.7/10
Creativity : 9.5/10 (dude you just found two loopholes in the rules that I won't mention because other players will copy the loopholes)
Cockpit : no gloss :(
overall rating : 9.2/10!
If there's a lot of planes that have this quality I will have to make a 2nd round to get the first 3 spots
huh..
Beautiful 🖐😌🖐
What is this peak blessing my eyes?
You did a really nice job bro
peak