Profile image

F-16C Fighting Falcon (General Dynamics)

87.1k Johndfg  7.7 years ago
3,962 downloads
Auto Credit Based on Johndfg's General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

An almost 1:1 scale F-16C!
This plane is the improved version of my Thunderbirds F-16

The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon is a single-engine supersonic multirole fighter aircraft originally developed by General Dynamics (now Lockheed Martin) for the United States Air Force (USAF)

AG 1 to drop fuel tanks
Trim to use flaps

She rolls to the left slightly when flying.

I hope you enjoy!
-John

My original f-16:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/KP9Z3i/F-16-Fighting-Falcon-General-Dynamics

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.19
  • Wing Loading 68.8lbs/ft2 (335.7kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 411.7ft2 (38.3m2)
  • Drag Points 8554

Parts

  • Number of Parts 598
  • Control Surfaces 13
  • Performance Cost 1,795
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    377 Khanskaya

    Removed the bombs, fuel tanks, and the fuselage blocks forming the bubble of the cockpit (I left the frame) and I added the cockpit from the F-16S and tweaked the engine to have a bit slower takeoff and a much lower top speed (the old top speed caused manually ering problems and I honestly don't care much for zooming across bare ocean)

    5.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    377 Khanskaya

    Time to start removing parts so I can run this on my potato

    5.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    87.1k Johndfg

    @Delosofy Awesome, thanks. Great video!

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    87.1k Johndfg

    @frostbite lol never

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k Shipwright

    @Johndfg can you help me with my Mig-21

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    87.1k Johndfg

    @LotusEngineering not really, it's basically a military of my thunderbirds f-16. Thanks though!

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    This deserves a LOT more upvotes

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    73.2k hopotumon

    from the front look sophisticated

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    I see your good, can you try a Piper Pawnee PA-25-235?

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,812 VailinPeral

    @REW I feel like any part that has to be modified in a way that the game user interface doesn't allow is a cheat. Going behind the interface and changing things in some other way than what most players will know how to do is cheating from my prespective.

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,812 VailinPeral

    @lemoose I plugged my own only after stating what I thought of this one. I'm tired of seeing pretty planes that have 200,000,000 fuel without weighing a million lbs too!

    @Johndfg this plane is not to scale, place it on the USS beast to see for yourself. It still looks pretty but I want form and function otherwise I never upvote and I always comment when something doesn't function right and still gets 40+ upvotes.

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    48.0k Sauce

    @Johndfg axaxa reupvote

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    87.1k Johndfg

    @Sauce love you bb

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    48.0k Sauce

    it's a successor to thunderbirds
    Unupvoted
    Uncommented
    Unsubscribed
    Unliked
    Unfollowed

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,845 SolarisAir

    Once again, my brain is roasted by your awesomeness.

    7.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    35.7k REW

    @VailinPeral This is not a online game.Using Xml parts and Mods is his freedom.I don't think it's "cheat".Sometimes XML parts are neccessary when you build replics.

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    87.1k Johndfg

    @MrWarPac lol

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.8k MrWarPac

    @Johndfg XD . Always know how it ends

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    87.1k Johndfg

    @MrWarPac lol, I get upset when people tell me I cheated by using fine tuner

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.8k MrWarPac

    What a mean comment .. XD

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    87.1k Johndfg

    @VailinPeral My plane is as realistic as you can get here, and I'm proud of that. It rolls because SP physics can't handle planes with this many parts. I'm not sure how I "cheated" or what rules I broke. And no offense, but your f-16 doesn't really look like an f-16.

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.0k lemoose

    @VailinPeral don't comment on planes just to plug your own

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,812 VailinPeral

    Looks good but doesn't fly very straight. Unbalanced and cheated fuel, I didn't test the topseed but with the way it was twisting it would be hard to do so.

    I think it's cool and all how someone can bend the rules to make something pretty but why doesn't anyone ever try to follow the rules when making replicas?

    Check out my F-16 falcon.9.2 it has a low part count a hgih top speed (1300+ mph) and it was done using only one cheat which is a slightly scaled up engine. Realistic fuel capacity and flight dynamics, it also includes an ejection system!

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.7k KCferrari

    Best looking f-16 yet

    7.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    You are a rare breed of users that never let us down!
    Don't stop m8

    7.7 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments