Profile image

Bumble1 cpx mk.5.7 Update

30.4k Hyattorama  5.7 years ago

Same plane as before, but a little more stability and a little less exploding. Cockpit by Sarpanitu.

Ag1- engine 1
Ag2- engine 2
Ag3- weak gyro (for easier takeoff and landing)
Ag7- strong gyro (for when you need to take your hands off the con to eat some Doritos or whatevs).

Enjoy!

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 30.1ft (9.2m)
  • Length 26.1ft (8.0m)
  • Height 10.3ft (3.1m)
  • Empty Weight 3,166lbs (1,436kg)
  • Loaded Weight 3,551lbs (1,610kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.563
  • Wing Loading 17.0lbs/ft2 (82.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 209.2ft2 (19.4m2)
  • Drag Points 1794

Parts

  • Number of Parts 252
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,406
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    True... @atgxtg

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    @Hyattorama But SR2 might be a different story.

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Yeah, for sure @atgxtg

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    @Hyattorama Yeah, I doubt it's possible. SP is a simulation, and it doesn't mirror reality exactly. So even if someone did an exactly replica, it wouldn't perform exactly the same due to those differences.

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Yeah, makes sense. It’s kind of impossible to get every single spec exactly accurate in SP. I haven’t seen one yet that’s exactly accurate in every way. @atgxtg

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    @Hyattorama More like 5 times as heavy. The real thing was around 1300 pounds when loaded. But lightweight planes are a pain in SP. You have to XML edit things and then deal with the fallout. Case in point, in order to get the thing to run for 1hr 45min on 20 gal of fuel, I had to lower the fuel input to around 3.5% of norm, and multiply the power by a factor of 28 to keep the 110 hp output. So now SP thinks my Bristol got a 3000 hp engine, even though it can only make 115 mph.

    As for your 130 mph, I've seen 132 listed in some places, but that was for the C model with the 130 hp engine.

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    You know, I took another look at my M1, and you’re right, it’s about twice as heavy as the real thing, but the top speed (130 mph) is spot on. @atgxtg

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    When you click on “Share Aircraft” the window comes up, the one where it gives you the option to write a description and take three photos, there’s a box that says “visibility” right under the box that says “account”. On the “visibility” box, just switch it from “public” to “unlisted”. Yeah, I suppose I could modify my build to make the weight and performance more accurate. It would be nice to have a better gun and a better livery too. Of course, you’re more than welcome to use my plane and make mods and post a “successor” plane. @atgxtg

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    @Hyattorama
    I haven't posted my version. Mine is mostly scaled, and flies, but needs some work to fix trim and adjust match up properly on performance. If I know how to post it "unlisted" I'd let you take a look at it for a laugh. I think my Vickers machine gun looks decent, but the rest is rather crude.

    Yours looks so much better.
    What I was thinking about your was to see if it could be scaled down in weight and power to match up with actual specs. I have a machine gun and some UK emblems you could have for cheap, too!

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Right on, thank you man! I’m finished with the M1. Or at least, I haven’t thought of anything I’d want to change about it at this time. What are you thinking about it? Have you posted your version yet? @atgxtg

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    Yes it is rudimentary, except for the twin props, but it works. There really isn't a need to make it more complex, and it is fun to fly. Now if you wanted to do something more with it, Idunno make it a seaplane, or STOL or something, then you'd have a reason to make it more complex, but even then, I'd rather start with a good basic design and add to it, as that way I know what the effects of any alterations are.

    BTW, I was doing some research for a plane and stumbled upon your Bristol M1. Are you still working on that? It looks pretty good, much better than my M1.

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.4k Hyattorama

    Right on, thank you so much!!! It’s pretty rudimentary I guess, but I think it’s fun to fly :) @atgxtg

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,514 atgxtg

    This is a really nice little plane.

    +1 5.6 years ago