Damn I was a bitch

@Rodrigo110 sure

Oh yeah, I sort of forgot about it and then stumbled on your profile again, found your unreplied message and decided to sort of clarify what I was saying @MrDoolittle

@Rodrigo110 it took you 11 days to respond

What do you mean? @MrDoolittle

@Rodrigo110 lol really thought this one out didn't you

I’m not, I was only trying to give a small reminder, and didn’t mean to start an argument. And by the way, I didn’t get ‘triggered’ that it didn’t have 100 parts, I was simply stating it to remind you, I was literally not angry at all... I don’t know why you thought I was @MrDoolittle

Also the only reason you would say this if you wanted it to be disqualified if I didn't fix it. Even though it flies like a turd with one wing.

@Rodrigo110 the elevator yes but not the entire bloody horizontal stabilizer.

I wasn’t attempting to state it friendly or with malice, it was meant to be simply neutral. Also, the elevator system was invented before WW1, it was existent over 30 years before the timeframe in which my aircraft was created... @MrDoolittle

And for you to use this type of design, that wasn't even invented yet therefore unrealistic for the time, in the way you are using it wouldn't it have to make your plane good compared to the rest of the aircraft?

@Rodrigo110 here is friendly: hey, your plane is below the minimum part count. Just a heads up.
Also I ask again, why even say it if you weren't trying to start something?

And how did I use ‘terrible wording?’ I simple stated it neutrally @MrDoolittle

Yes! And my fictional company (me) decided that the elevators would be much more effective and be able to be withstand more damage before being destroyed! It is realistic! @MrDoolittle

@Rodrigo110 because if your read the rules, as you are so keen on doing, it says, "must be realistic," even if it is fictional.

I know, but it was used again in the “Spitz” because it allowed more armour to be installed on the tail, and it also improved manoeuvrability. It was not used, but my aircraft is fictional and I am the creator of it, so if these advantages were evident, why wouldn’t I use it? @MrDoolittle

And why even say it if your weren't trying to start something? Your wording is terrible too if you were going for a friendly reminder.

@Rodrigo110 the entire horizontal stabilizer moving to pitch up has not been around since ww1

Ok, I think you need to calm down. I didn’t mean to provoke you in any way, I was just stating mere facts. Also, the elevators from my “Spitz” existed as far back as ww1, and the elevators on my “Kingston” were the standard ones for ww2.@MrDoolittle

@Rodrigo110 btw your plane is against the rules too, the horizontal stabilizers are unrealistic for the time.

@Rodrigo110 can u not be an ass? This is my fourth entry and I clearly gave up after my first one. The soul purpose of this plane is to get shot down and look cool while doing so. Go play dungeons and dragons, there's plenty of rules you can be a dick about there. (My first plane got upgraded at 65 parts and then accepted)

Yes, he’s been upgrading them, but he does that after they’ve been accepted. And also, he’s not upgrading all the aircraft, he’s only doing some of them. Anyway, he clearly says in the rules ‘if you break the rules you will be disqualified @MrDoolittle

@Rodrigo110 in case you haven't notice miko has been fixing up a lot a planes and you don't need to tell me because your not miko

Hey just a reminder, the minimum part count is 100, so this is below the part count and breaks the rules.