Auto Credit Based on Shugie's F-5E Tiger II Remastered
T-38 Talon - Light Trainer - NASA Livery
Upvotes are appreciated!
This airframe has no weapons, It is a trainer.
Short History of the aircraft:
In the 1950s, during Northrop's light fighter program that lead to the creation of the F-5A Freedom Fighter, It was thought perfect as also a trainer aircraft for the USAF, light, inexpensive, easy to maintain. The T-38 took flight before the F-5A, in the same year, 1959, and introduced a year before the F-5A in 1961. The T-38 has went on to be extensively used in many roles. Including the job of help guiding the American Space Shuttles in for landing.
STS-3 Landing, T-38 Talons by its side.
Thats all for now, thanks everyone for all the upvotes and support on my F-5E!
Specifications
Spotlights
- MonsterAvgeek 7 months ago
- Bryan5 7 months ago
- VeroViper 7 months ago
- Dragoranos 7 months ago
- Zaineman 7 months ago
- HanakoSan 7 months ago
- MrCOPTY 7 months ago
- TheFlightGuySP 7 months ago
- Anguirus380 7 months ago
- AverageUMP45Simp 7 months ago
- RepublicOfCursedPlanes 7 months ago
- ToeTips 7 months ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor F-5E Tiger II Remastered
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 21.3ft (6.5m)
- Length 34.3ft (10.5m)
- Height 10.9ft (3.3m)
- Empty Weight 2,007lbs (910kg)
- Loaded Weight 6,470lbs (2,935kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.146
- Wing Loading 44.8lbs/ft2 (218.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 144.5ft2 (13.4m2)
- Drag Points 685
Parts
- Number of Parts 310
- Control Surfaces 2
- Performance Cost 1,255
@Thunderthud
@Schmeckles05
@MrCOPTY
@Bryan5
@TheFlightGuySP
@Talon7192
@MobileBuilder21 thx
Great work
@CAS6041 Tailhook or not, this isn't an accurate build, its just a reskin of my F-5E which was made for someone's screenshots
my dad flys the talon so don't question me @Shugie (randolph afb Tx)
@CAS6041 all F-5 variants, including the talon, had a tail hook, its for land emergency landings
also WHAT THE HECK THIS IS A AIR FORCE PLANE WHAT THE HECK TAIL HOOK
mmmm pretty accurate except for cockpit
@TacamT60LightTank Its a goofy ahh plane afterall
Goofy ahh looking from the front fr
@Suekikun8888 Thanks!
Beautiful!
Alr well anyways good luck with that Yak @Shugie
@xxXxPilotxXxx Ill consider it for the future, I'm currently working on my next big project, the Yak-141
Can u make the A-4 Skyhawk NASA?
@TacamT60LightTank Thank you
Nice plane
@HoshimachiSuiseiMyBeloved The Space Shuttle is being developed by Schmeckles05
good plane for a low part count!
I want the space shuttle pls
@VeroViper thank you
@Shugie planes under 600 part can considered "mobile friendly" (for most users)
@VeroViper Doubt it lol, but thank you, because I use a NASA supercomputer as a PC, I can run several thousand part builds perfectly fine, and right now I have no one to test if its mobile friendly or not
decent part count
you'll become gold in the next 2 days (probably)