Profile image

WarriorHawks XF-13XSR (Prototype)

1,440 Lavine  one month ago
Auto Credit Based on CessnaIsCool's Naval Challenge!

Ag1: 3DTVC
Ag2: seat ejection
Ag3: Hard Pitch up (cobra)
Ag4: Refuel probe
Ag5: parachutes
Ag6: gyro
Ag7: Landing hook
Ag8: lights

Trim up for afterburner
trim down for emergency air brakes
Vtol down flaps
vtol up for magic
Takeoff speed : 101KN
landing speed : 130/110KN
use afterburners Only for a stable slow subsonic flight(missiles can't shoot you down)
Could Perform Cobra, Sharp pulls with 3DTVC On and Button 3 (strategy & Skills)

Built & flight tested around Wright, Yeager,Avalanche, Beast,Bandit(she went throughout the valleys without handling issues 300/3000Feet)
she likes to dance in the sky & handles the backflips like a boss.

Combat tested around Avalanche,Yeager,Wright,Bandit(You'll know the Rest)

Please feel free to Point out Faulty parts & issues
And i really need test pilots for It and other Aircrafts too..
Next Generation XF13XSR will get massive updates and Improvements if needed

Upcoming :
WarriorHawks CSTM SAK1XSLR
WarriorHawks CSTM SU27XSR
WarriorHawks G9XSR
WarriorHawks G11XLR
WarriorHawks XF1XSR

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Naval Challenge!
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 53.4ft (16.3m)
  • Length 50.7ft (15.4m)
  • Height 10.6ft (3.2m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 13,987lbs (6,344kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 3.663
  • Wing Loading 28.6lbs/ft2 (139.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 489.3ft2 (45.5m2)
  • Drag Points 3339

Parts

  • Number of Parts 218
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 1,844
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @Lavine it is a hard plane to stabilize unfortunately.. i will try my best after i finish up with the F/A-45 MK-II

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    1,440 Lavine

    @ZealousKestrel yes please!
    I'll let you know
    XF Series Versions with FBW & More realistic slow Missiles would be a Perfect combo

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    if you need me to i can always help with the FBW !

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Lavine makes sense, you dont have to move it too far back, and an FBW system always helps if it gets to the point of instability (the SAK-1 has a system that can be toggled on and off for TVC and stability of the stabilizers to act like FBW or legacy controls)

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    1,440 Lavine

    @MoHoJIiT thanks mate 🫶

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    1,440 Lavine

    @ZealousKestrel i kept it on purpose for stable flights

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    2,400 MoHoJIiT

    Interesting and unique design

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Lavine and a tip that you can use to make your aircraft better at PSM and more maneuverable.. place the CoM closer to the CoL, and have both farther back on the aircraft, this way it will be more in control during psm even without TVC
    (but put them too close together and you begin to lose stability, especially if turning sharp)

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Lavine sorry you need to use @ZealousKestrel to ping me.. changed my username and all, i hope it doesnt confuse you
    and this is a nice plane! it isnt the most maneuverable if not doing PSM, but it has nice armaments, and while the cockpit is the same for the G67 it still looks very nice. and i like the sweep wing, it kinda reminds me of an F-14

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    1,440 Lavine

    @zilozite

    one month ago