Hello there, people who clicked on this post. If you clicked on this post, I'm sure that the reason would be because of the aircraft featured to the left of this description and you thought it looked neat, or maybe because the title of this post. It's nothing that serious, but I believe that I should first address the aircraft I featured here. Her name is Project Archangel, a project I've had in the works for a while, in fact even being built alongside Fenrir. She's not really capable of stable flight yet (She was actually supposed to be kept in secrecy, really) but I hope to fix that soon. It's also painted in a gold scheme (Very original, I know) Now that I've properly introduced you to Archangel, I'd like to present something. As you just read there, the aircraft was simply named 'Project Archangel'. To me, it doesn't appeal to my sense of creativity, and I'm sure that it also doesn't to many others. What I'm proposing to you, the reader and follower and maybe even a couple of high class aircraft designers, is that I create all of my crafts under a organizational title, a company if you will. Only a proposition, if you wish for me to keep the titles of my crafts as, simply, projects, then I would find no reason to argue. Or maybe you would like for me to classify all of my crafts under a title of a organization (All future and present crafts that are not based off of an already existing design will be affected). I have already decided on a organization name: all I'm waiting for is the feedback from you.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 147.8ft (45.0m)
- Length 119.8ft (36.5m)
- Height 16.2ft (4.9m)
- Empty Weight 53,726lbs (24,369kg)
- Loaded Weight 117,862lbs (53,461kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.144
- Wing Loading 41.5lbs/ft2 (202.8kg/m2)
- Wing Area 2,837.6ft2 (263.6m2)
- Drag Points 30049
Parts
- Number of Parts 385
- Control Surfaces 12
- Performance Cost 2,054
And you as well.
@SteadfastContracting Thank you! Have a nice day.
Well, you have my opinion. Hope you get some others to give feedback too.
@SteadfastContracting I agree.
I think just being under one title is what I would do.
@YuukaNeko Yes, I realize that, but I want to classify my crafts all under one title, instead of the titles being random, such as some as concepts, some as projects, some as prototypes, and some as experimental crafts. It would be seemingly easier to create one organization series in which all crafts share a title, for example: (Watercraft) [Organization name] Omega and (Aircraft) [Organization name] Archangel. I could even start a proper line of crafts, similarly to the US' X series of experimental aircraft.
You realize you're already kind of doing that, right? You have broad aircraft designations "Prototype" and "Project" and you also have specific aircraft prefixes, like what the US does with the F- series and the Russians with the SU- series. I prefer a company name for all projects, like for my fictional gun line I label as YTech (Yuuka Tech) just to let people know what category they fall into
@SteadfastContracting Thank you for your feedback! Yes, I really am leaning towards classifying all my aircraft under a single title, instead of complicated designations, although I'd like to know what other people think before I continue.
I don't mind how you do it now, but it would be cool if you did this. It sounds like this is what you want to do and that's all that really matters at the end of the day.
@UnknownNate Yes it is!