No Tags
If you like firefighter but you think it should involve more plane you gonna love this one!
Use this beast just like french firefighters : take off, scoop water (please land on water below 160 mph) and go kick the ass of the fires!
Retract landings gears with VTOL up. Enjoy!
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 65.4ft (19.9m)
- Length 41.8ft (12.8m)
- Height 14.6ft (4.5m)
- Empty Weight 13,996lbs (6,348kg)
- Loaded Weight 18,487lbs (8,385kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.458
- Wing Loading 21.8lbs/ft2 (106.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 847.9ft2 (78.8m2)
- Drag Points 5659
Parts
- Number of Parts 267
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 727
- Log in to leave a comment
-
25.2k JacobHardy64Why hasn't this been rated?!8.9 years ago
-
129 Lolivier@thomasjaf Ah d'accord..9.1 years ago
-
5,850 thomasjaf@Lolivier Oui mais c'est très utilisé en France!9.1 years ago
-
129 LolivierComment ça des bombardiers d'eau français?! C'est canadien ça hein lol (oui je suis de retour sur SimplePlanes :D )9.1 years ago
-
5,850 thomasjaf@Thebrendon55c http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/QmUN65/Test9.2 years ago
-
2,351 Oblivion@thomasjaf my ww2 plane is already uploaded for you to do the test on btw9.2 years ago
-
2,351 Oblivion@thomasjaf the c-119 dosnt go anywhere with either if you spin them it the same speed9.2 years ago
-
5,850 thomasjaf@Thebrendon55c Did you try what I've told you on the C-119? Send me an example of what you say, I don't beleive you!9.2 years ago
-
2,351 Oblivion@thomasjaf The reason it seems like that on that one is because part of it drags the ground a little in the rear but I tested something like that on my WW2 era plane by making it spin just as fast with the nozzles on the tips as it would with them on the rotators then put them on the rotators and made the same speed happen again and the plane went maybe half a mile per hour slower with it on the rotators so while the nozzles on the tips do provide some form of propulsion to the airplane it is very miniscule and unavoidable to make a practical prop airplane.9.2 years ago
-
5,850 thomasjaf@Thebrendon55c Nope. Watch them when they are stopped, they are both pointing to the rear. Block the axis on both propellers of your C-119 and see by yourself.9.2 years ago
-
2,351 Oblivion@Thebrendon55c nvm that one I misthought it but the tilt of the nozzle is wayy to shallow to make a plane go at 250 plus mph with only 3 vtol engines.9.2 years ago
-
2,351 Oblivion@thomasjaf When you use 45 degree tilt one points back one points forward so if that did make and thrust it would cancel itself out9.2 years ago
-
5,850 thomasjaf@Thebrendon55c https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/7dx08k/CRF-H-Prototype This kind of stuff use the force of the blades, the others, the VTOL nozzle point back when you tilt the blades, I did the test run and when the nozzles don't tilte the efficiency is... bad! I'll see your lambada shuttle, but seems really hard!9.2 years ago
-
2,351 Oblivion@thomasjaf also you are goood with making things fly so can you check out my revision of the lambada shuttle and see if you can give some input? ive tried just about everything9.2 years ago
-
2,351 Oblivion@thomasjaf it does in fact use ony blade force no nozzle force nozzle force just makes it turn. you can prove it by increasing the tilt on the blades and the plane goes faster and real props are not much bigger if not the same size as the ones on it9.2 years ago
-
5,850 thomasjaf@Thebrendon55c Please do, but I didn't because "real prop" are very big and only use the force of the nozzle and not the force of the blade... And you'll probably have trouble taking off the water as well. Anyway, do whatever you want!9.2 years ago
-
2,351 OblivionCool design do you mind if I make it a real prop power plane?9.2 years ago
