Profile image

P-56-M

6,468 Typhlosion130  7.3 years ago
55 downloads
Auto Credit Based on Typhlosion130's P-56-I

Drag optimized body section. Fuel ammount optimization.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor P-56-I
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 63.7ft (19.4m)
  • Length 46.8ft (14.3m)
  • Height 17.9ft (5.5m)
  • Empty Weight 17,385lbs (7,886kg)
  • Loaded Weight 19,291lbs (8,750kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 1.399
  • Wing Loading 11.2lbs/ft2 (54.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,715.5ft2 (159.4m2)
  • Drag Points 241

Parts

  • Number of Parts 52
  • Control Surfaces 15
  • Performance Cost 453
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    55.3k Beefy

    @Typhlosion130 lmao

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Alienbeef0421 you're*

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    55.3k Beefy

    @Typhlosion130 your welcome :D

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Alienbeef0421 just a note. with out your gift this would have been my entry. honestly I think I've hit the limit of how fast I can get this thing. but on the bright side I am able to fit working landing gear which allows take off from runway on it. which means if we get a prop tournament on a track that starts from a take off I have a good advantage :P

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Zkillerwolfe because the body in its entity is much larger. longer. and retains its width for longer.

    that said its also quite heavy. like. not just becasue it has a ton of engines but because the giant mess that is the engine mounting points inside that thing are often much bigger than they need to be but at this point its nearly unfixable. I just managed to get this to work. had to use fine tuner to re-align the engines after changing a few parts that were on it to straghten the casing and make it this smooth.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,659 Zkillerwolfe

    @Typhlosion130
    I wasn't trying to suggest that you haven't done your best to reduce drag. That said I have a T3000 plane on my pc with 109 drag. I'm just mystified why your plane has considerably more drag, considering that your nose design doesn't seem worse. :S

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Zkillerwolfe You think I haven't tried reducing drag? the previous version has 501 drag points. and that's about the best i'm going t get. these' aren't the small T1000 engines. this is the largest T3000. and the wings already are set to flat. and don't produce drag so best I can do.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,659 Zkillerwolfe

    @Typhlosion130
    Quite a good plane. It seems however to have more drag than I would expect from looking at it. Which is unfortunate, this plane seems to reach 2:13 on my machine and I think it would hit 2:11 or 2:12 if you could reduce the drag to 109 or so.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Viperfox take it as a complement. not a lot of people know how to build stronk.

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Viperfox don't. trust me. this is the top 5% of people here. there's the other 95% which you'll compete against. that said you mind mentioning me in your entry for a bit if critique?

    7.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SkullsAndCrossbones @Viperfox you know. I hate to break it too you. but this thing sucks compared to the entries that I know are going to win.

    7.3 years ago