Profile image

Top Fuel Dragster CHALLENGE (closed)

10.5k Dpdfuzz  3.2 years ago
Auto Credit Based on MrShenanigansSP's Top Fuel Dragster CHALLENGE (CLOSED)

My Top Fuel Dragster submission. AG3- Chutes *Judge/Op - Main tires run off 2 engines in front of cockpit.  Rear engine was too slow and lacked yeet.  Jets used for visual effect only.  Great category idea! Had fun! ]https://i.postimg.cc/ZK6x3Vtj/Screenshot-20210318-164352-Simple-Planes.jpg)![

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Top Fuel Dragster CHALLENGE (CLOSED)
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 15.1ft (4.6m)
  • Length 58.8ft (17.9m)
  • Height 16.2ft (5.0m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 32,972lbs (14,955kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 8.587
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.03
  • Wing Loading 956.8lbs/ft2 (4,671.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 34.5ft2 (3.2m2)
  • Drag Points 9270

Parts

  • Number of Parts 345
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 1,352
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    55.6k PapaKernels

    @Dpdfuzz yea no problem, its one of the coolest looking dragsters on the site, period!

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.5k Dpdfuzz

    @PapaKernels first off thank you for the spotlight! Didn't get too much love for it. It was ridiculously slow @ 11k Hp. I overlooked the xml traction value! Found it... Gonna try it! Thank you

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    55.6k PapaKernels

    This is super dope!!! What you could do to get more grip so it does have good launch is to xml mod the wheels to have around 600 forward traction, that will make it alot better, I only had to put my engine at 2000hp and I got it to a very realistic speed.

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Dpdfuzz ok... No problem

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.5k Dpdfuzz

    @MrShenanigans Yes im not even sure what it equates to but I had fun thank you

    3.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    I am sorry but your engines has more power than 11,000HP which is against the rules but this is a very good build sorry

    3.2 years ago