Name: LTS T-75 / Su-75 Checkmate
Type: Lazy Replica
Attempt #: 1
Falkenwut Generation Build: 5
So here's my LTS T-75 / SU-75 Checkmate, Russia's mockup concept for a new Multi-role lightweight stealth fighter design unveileved recently.
Special thanks goes to a user Noelaychan00 from Skipper's SimplePlanes Discord Server for the blueprints above
Thanks to @Zalyarowsky 's SU-75 for the idea of how to fix the nose intake shape
Special thanks to @asteroidbook345 for confirming the actual designation name for this specific model.
Trim - Trim
Flaps - Flaps
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 39.2ft (12.0m)
- Length 58.6ft (17.9m)
- Height 15.4ft (4.7m)
- Empty Weight 31,785lbs (14,417kg)
- Loaded Weight 37,878lbs (17,181kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.889
- Wing Loading 56.0lbs/ft2 (273.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 676.1ft2 (62.8m2)
- Drag Points 2379
Parts
- Number of Parts 90
- Control Surfaces 4
- Performance Cost 548
It's E P I C
@LightningTreeSavor would be awesome, but no.
it's Light Tactical Aircraft [Legkij Takticheskie Samolyet]
@Falkenwut is this plane named after me? LOL
Ur pfp says it all 😂 @asteroidbook345
@Xx24reminder Beats me... I'm presuming there's a reason, (ex. design number) but don't know... Interesting topic to research!!
@Falkenwut I meant,if that's what the prototype su-57 was named,why wouldn't the su-75 prototype be named in that order?
@Xx24reminder That would be the T-50 / SU-57 Felon, Not the T-75 / SU-75 Checkmate. 2 Different planes.
@MuizTheMobileFriendly It took me a while to see it but put a smile on my face as well :D
@Zalyarowsky It's a lazy build, just built it coz I could, didn't bother too much with details... Including the baydoor systems for that matter.
For better dogfighting this plane would need fly-by-wire. Like many modern fighters, the planes are inherintly unstable and can only fly properly with fly-by-wire technology. Frankly, I have no idea how to implement in game...
If you know how to fix the engine problem, please share! I couldn't find out why it does it!
Happy plane
@Haytham115, agreed
Needing better engine, he can't goodly flight at dogfights
Engine hides to inside plane when thrust activated
@Falkenwut did they call the su-57 t-50 back then?
@Xx24reminder It's a T-75.. not T-70... shrugs
@Zalyarowsky As per description... No idea how the user got it though...
@Haytham115 Feel free to fix it as a successor :)
Doesn't quite look like the T-70
WHERE YOU FOUND BLUEPRINT
Bad for thrust vectoring please put a better engine
Very cool!
nice build
@Falkenwut np lol
@asteroidbook345 Confirmed and fixed, thanks!
@Falkenwut As far as I know the VVS hasn't said the designation, people are just thinking it's Su-75 because it has a 75 on the side. That's not indicative of the designation, and likely either stands for T-75 or simply Idyelize 75, which wouldn't be a designation of the aircraft, but rather a designation of the design. It's like how the Su-57 was the T-50 pre-production
@asteroidbook345 I heard about the mis-designation. Could you please provide the proper designation and if there is any documentation saying so. Many news outlets have already stuck to the su-75 bandwagon apparently...