Profile image

F19b carrier strike fighter program 1.1

17.4k karlosdarkness  8.5 years ago
27 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on Matthew240's F-19B Strike Fighter

Given that the initial version couldn't take off or land on a carrier this variant is a major step forward. More power, more control surfaces, vectored nozzles, the gear moved to facilitate easier nose up and airbrakes that make landing approaches at more sensible speeds. The plane is also capable of super cruising on 50% power and can hits mach2+ quite easily.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor F-19B Strike Fighter
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 27.2ft (8.3m)
  • Length 38.4ft (11.7m)
  • Height 10.5ft (3.2m)
  • Empty Weight 15,663lbs (7,104kg)
  • Loaded Weight 36,750lbs (16,669kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.568
  • Wing Loading 85.3lbs/ft2 (416.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 430.8ft2 (40.0m2)
  • Drag Points 3010

Parts

  • Number of Parts 50
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 436
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    5,204 Matthew240

    yup @Nickasaurus

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    37.7k Decrepit

    and two more engines just means you crammed vtol into the body. but i don't want to be on anybodies bad side so lets just forget this whole thing :)

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    37.7k Decrepit

    in my opinion the thrust vectoring does the opposite of help in most cases

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,204 Matthew240

    yeah but Design wise you ruined it @karlosdarkness

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Nickasaurus two additional engines, two large intakes, four airbrakes (vtol slide) and the gear moved so she's able to nose up on a deck, that and yaw control, vectored thrust and significant elevator alteration, it's a prety significant evolution if you ask me.

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Matthew240 your names at the top, quite clearly a successor.

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    37.7k Decrepit

    I have to agree with Matthew here, while yours is slightly more maneuverable its a tiny change you made that didn't exactly need to be uploaded.

    8.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,204 Matthew240

    bro, first things first, thanks for giving me credit(not) second did u try it at all it can takeoff from the use tiny with ease bro and it had airbrakes dude and it can takeoff fine id didn't need the gear moved

    8.5 years ago