Basically a V2. I don’t know how to limit the altitude. Purchaseable as a base for a ballistic missile.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 12.9ft (3.9m)
- Length 12.9ft (3.9m)
- Height 28.2ft (8.6m)
- Empty Weight 4,818lbs (2,185kg)
- Loaded Weight 5,158lbs (2,339kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 6.535
- Wing Loading 37.6lbs/ft2 (183.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 137.2ft2 (12.8m2)
- Drag Points 5173
Parts
- Number of Parts 14
- Control Surfaces 4
- Performance Cost 119
@RB107 ITS LITTERALY A V2
first
(pls pin ;-;)
@RB107 I am calling it a rocket.
@AeroTactical Then why you said it in description and answer 'yeah' to @DeeganWithABazooka's question?
@AeroTactical Then explain the description
@DeeganWithABazooka @DeeganWithABazooka @RB107 I don’t mean it to go to space.
@RB107 This argument cannot be beaten...
@AeroTactical German V-2 rocket even without its warhead, could not reach outer space as defined by the Kármán line (100 km altitude).
.
V-2 was designed as a ballistic missile, not a space launch vehicle. With a standard warhead (about 1,000 kg), it reached a maximum altitude of around 80-90 km on a vertical flight. Removing the warhead would reduce its weight, increasing altitude somewhat, but not enough to cross the 100 km threshold.
.
V-2's single-stage liquid-fuel engine provided a specific impulse of about 239 seconds and a total burn time of around 65 seconds. This was insufficient to achieve the velocity needed for orbital or suborbital spaceflight (approximately 7.9 km/s for low Earth orbit). Even without a payload, V2 rocket's maximum velocity was around 1.6 km/s.
.
V-2 lacked the structural design and guidance systems for stable flight beyond its intended suborbital trajectory. Its fins and gyroscopic stabilization were optimized for atmospheric flight, not the vacuum of space.
.
While V-2 was a groundbreaking technology, it was not a space rocket. Post-WWII, modified V-2s used in U.S. experiments (e.g., Project Bumper) reached altitudes up to 400 km by adding upper stages, but the base V-2 alone couldn’t achieve this.
.
In short, a V-2 without its warhead could fly higher than its standard configuration but still lacked the power, design, and velocity to reach outer space.
.
Thats my argument.
@DeeganWithABazooka
@AviationLoverGEEK444
@AviationLoverGEEK444 I agree
@AviationLoverGEEK444 yes 1950 to 1960 ten years for riset then launch like in 1965.
@RB107 let’s be for real tho, this should be started in the 1960 atleast
How lee fuk, a space program?! I consider to start that program in 1950 and someone is already make one in 1946 (T~T)
Ok this is waaaaay toooo early
@DeeganWithaBazooka don’t you agree?
@AeroTactical @DeeganWithABazooka it’s like a V-2 but no warhead.
@DeeganWithABazooka yeah.
Tags 3: @SuperSuperTheSylph
Tags 2: @SupremeSpeed25 @Halcyon215 @Deeganishcountryball
Wait rocket to space?
Intentionally?
Tags: @CrestelAeronautics @Cuboidable @keiyronelleavgeek566
Republic of Nether-Jim
@AviationLoverGEEK444
Unity Steaks:
@Bugati87
Kingdom of Bell-Lands:
@SPWithLizzie
Celestial empire:
@LunarEclipseSP
No-See Jerry Head of Defense:
@RepublicofWrightIsles
Republic of Next-In-Co:
@Aeromax
Unity Ding-Dong:
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA
Republic of For-Rants:
@keiyronelleavgeek566
Republic of Kinda:
@IAmSteve
Socket Onion:
@DeeganWithABazooka
No-See Jerry:
@RB107
Kingdom of Pole-Land:
@BigHeadEngineering