No Tags
This is the U-2 Dragonlady, it was suggested by KingDeadshot. the U-2 is a high altitude renascence aircraft used by the U.S during the cold war to photograph russian nuclear missile silo's. it was used to photograph the silo's up to the point that one was shot down by a russian SAM. then the U.S decided to make a plane that could fly at an even higher altitude, that plane was the sr-71 blackbird, soon the u-2 wasnt was used less and slowly replaced by the sr-71, which also fell out of use as there was no need for high altitude renascence. -BlueWhiskyYT
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 47.3ft (14.4m)
- Length 35.3ft (10.8m)
- Height 9.7ft (3.0m)
- Empty Weight 4,073lbs (1,847kg)
- Loaded Weight 5,689lbs (2,580kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.777
- Wing Loading 25.6lbs/ft2 (124.8kg/m2)
- Wing Area 222.7ft2 (20.7m2)
- Drag Points 2590
Parts
- Number of Parts 64
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 271
- Log in to leave a comment
-
113k TMach5I didn't know it was called "Dragonlady."..Nice work!8.7 years ago
-
2,640 BlueWhiskySP@Plasma no problem8.7 years ago
-
2,166 TheGoldenAcethank you8.7 years ago
-
2,640 BlueWhiskySP@Plasma well played plasma!8.7 years ago
-
2,166 TheGoldenAceimages are not the only source of information. :-P8.7 years ago
-
2,166 TheGoldenAceno they are fuel tanks. the hold 105 gallons of fuel google it. the wiki entry says "The Lockheed U-2, nicknamed "Dragon Lady", is a SINGLE JET ENGINE, ultra-high altitude reconnaissance aircraft"8.7 years ago
-
2,640 BlueWhiskySP@Plasma search u-2 dragonlady, and if you look at one that shows the back of the supposed "fuel pods" you can see a small hole. thats a part of a jet engine8.7 years ago
-
2,166 TheGoldenAcenice, a couple of apperance modifacations ind it will be perfect8.7 years ago
-
2,166 TheGoldenAcealso, try removing the inlet on the wings, they are fuel pods8.7 years ago
-
2,166 TheGoldenAcesorry i am a sticler for spy aircraft8.7 years ago
-
8,758 Meawk@BlueWhiskyYT DANGIT auto correct !!8.7 years ago
-
2,166 TheGoldenAceits not renaissance, it is reconissance8.7 years ago
-
2,640 BlueWhiskySP@Meawk i meant to say renaissance, but i spelled it wrong originally and thats what auto-correct told me how it was spelt8.7 years ago
-
8,758 Meawkrenascence?8.7 years ago
