Profile image

F-100F Super Sabre Semi Realistic

15 Gamerdrexp  one year ago
Auto Credit Based on OpenHere's F-100F Super Sabre

Basically uhh, this is just an improved version made by me.My goals in making this Aircraft:-Semi-Realistic Cockpit-Achieve Accurate Thrust to weight ratio with accurate speed-Improve the plane loadout-fix, and give the AGM-45 an accurate weight-Still be mobile friendlyAchieved:-fix, and give the AGM-45 an accurate weight-Semi-Realistic Cockpit-Improve the plane loadout-fix, and give the AGM-45 an accurate weight-Still be mobile friendlyWhat Failed:Even with 2.6 Thrust To 1 Weight Ratio, this plane is still slow as hellReturnOfJeffChandler: Credits to him for everything in the aircraft except Cockpit Frame, Gunsight, and AN/ALE-15 chaffGamerdrexp(me): Added the cockpit, AN/ALE-15 chaff luncher, and fix the AGM-45Mistert: Credits to him for the gunsightKarameji: Credits to him for the Cockpit FrameEZkel: Credits to him for the gunsight reticleWhat improved?I improved the AGM-45 that it wouldn't be that unreliableMade an AN/ALE-15 Chaff pod from scratch and installed it hereMade a Semi Realistic CockpitMade a Realistic SEAD loadoutNote:Even tho I could improve the AGM-45 performance that would make it the best in the world, I choose to make it a little bit unreliable so if you wanna hit something, fire when the enemy is at very center of your gunsight, or it'll have high chance of missing. If you find a problem I might improve it. Loadout:2x AN/ALE Chaff Pod x60 ammo each2x Drop Tank2x M39 20mm2x AGM-45A "Shrike"To the owner of the aircraft:If you want to take this down, feel free to do it. The aircraft was yours anyways, I only want to share my improvement to other people

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor F-100F Super Sabre
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 34.8ft (10.6m)
  • Length 49.4ft (15.1m)
  • Height 17.0ft (5.2m)
  • Empty Weight 21,821lbs (9,897kg)
  • Loaded Weight 27,565lbs (12,503kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.592
  • Wing Loading 23.0lbs/ft2 (112.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,197.5ft2 (111.3m2)
  • Drag Points 1040

Parts

  • Number of Parts 868
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 3,102
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    Guys sorry for the description if it's hard to read, im new to uploading plane sin website heres the improved description:

    basically uhh, this is just an improved version made by me.

    My goals in making this Aircraft:
    -Semi-Realistic Cockpit
    -Achieve Accurate Thrust to weight ratio with accurate speed
    -Improve the plane loadout
    -fix, and give the AGM-45 an accurate weight
    -Still be mobile friendly

    Achieved:
    -fix, and give the AGM-45 an accurate weight
    -Semi-Realistic Cockpit
    -Improve the plane loadout
    -fix, and give the AGM-45 an accurate weight
    -Still be mobile friendly

    What Failed:

    Even with 2.6 Thrust To 1 Weight Ratio, this plane is still slow as hell

    ReturnOfJeffChandler: Credits to him for everything in the aircraft except Cockpit Frame, Gunsight, and AN/ALE-15 chaff
    Gamerdrexp(me): Added the cockpit, AN/ALE-15 chaff luncher, and fix the AGM-45
    Mistert: Credits to him for the gunsight
    Karameji: Credits to him for the Cockpit Frame
    EZkel: Credits to him for the gunsight reticle

    What improved?
    I improved the AGM-45 that it wouldn't be that unreliable
    Made an AN/ALE-15 Chaff pod from scratch and installed it here
    Made a Semi Realistic Cockpit
    Made a Realistic SEAD loadout

    Note:
    Even tho I could improve the AGM-45 performance that would make it the best in the world, I choose to make it a little bit unreliable so if you wanna hit something, fire when the enemy is at very center of your gunsight, or it'll have high chance of missing.

    If you find a problem I might improve it.

    Loadout:
    2x AN/ALE Chaff Pod x60 ammo each
    2x Drop Tank
    2x M39 20mm
    2x AGM-45A "Shrike"

    To the owner of the aircraft:
    If you want to take this down, feel free to do it. The aircraft was yours anyways, I only want to share my improvement to other people

    Pinned one year ago
  • Profile image

    @RebelAlpha Maybe it is like a half year after i replied to this, but I actually lost all my build but i have tried it before, just as i said, the only thing that will change is lag. Since less drag = less calculations. It does not imrpove speed tho, maybe a bit.

    5 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,708 OpenHere

    @RebelAlpha well the drag itself isn’t something you’d go by, we all go by a grain of salt on drag calculations.

    one year ago
  • Profile image

    @ReturnOfJeffChandler Well in the grand scheme of things (this game not having completely realistic physics), I think this game has way too much drag... so to overcome the drag you either need to jack up the engine power... or reduce drag. Increasing the engine power is the easiest and quickest way.

    Though in real life, 30,000 pounds of thrust is quite a bit and it's a realistic number.

    one year ago
  • Profile image

    @ReturnOfJeffChandler thx for upvote 😀

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    4,708 OpenHere

    @RebelAlpha the other way around. Engines having 33Kn thrust is more than enough power. Drag just outweighs the performance

    one year ago
  • Profile image

    @RebelAlpha So you are saying that was possible? I remove every drag in a modify F-15 it only increased speed by 10 mph

    one year ago
  • Profile image

    @RebelAlpha thx for saying, but i really hate them, perhaps some builds speed is just same cruising. I reduced drag on some of my aircraft part before uploading this with twd of 0.570, it increased speed by 3mph lol

    one year ago
  • Profile image

    I find engines are generally underpowered in this game.

    To get realistic speed you have to increase the power multiplier by a ton (but it has the side effect of giving your aircraft unrealistic acceleration). It does however allow for shorter takeoffs (oh well lol).

    The other option may be to reduce the drag on every part of your aircraft (I have not tested this, so IDK if this would work better... if at all). That would be a lot more work though.

    one year ago