Profile image

F-2.4 "Outline"

47.6k Graingy  1.3 years ago

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 19.4ft (5.9m)
  • Length 27.9ft (8.5m)
  • Height 8.9ft (2.7m)
  • Empty Weight 7,310lbs (3,315kg)
  • Loaded Weight 9,581lbs (4,345kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.876
  • Wing Loading 84.8lbs/ft2 (413.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 113.0ft2 (10.5m2)
  • Drag Points 1665

Parts

  • Number of Parts 49
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 250
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    If you want one, $2,500,000 USD.

    5 months ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @TheMouse honestly I can’t remember what my design process was tbh

    +1 11 months ago
  • Profile image
    66.4k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    You can make the same conclusion by just making the rear control surfaces smaller, but its just not as efficient.

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @TheMouse perhaps, but the whole reason this plane is so dogshit is that I kept overload off limits. Maybe adjust too? Idk, it was supposed to resemble something I had the tech to make back when I first started (just with more design sense).

    +1 11 months ago
  • Profile image
    66.4k TheMouse

    Not much really changed, as center of mass and lift was not the problem with this plane. I agree that it got slightly better, but not much. What would really make this more flyable is changing the control surfaces. The rear control surfaces need to have less of a max angle. The front (roll) ones need to be smaller.

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 What?
    No, it was more stable.

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy well you are a grain of sand maybe your skills got better

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 Odd, I could have sworn it got substantially more flyable?

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy no it flew worse

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 Did it not at least improve?

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy uhhh i tried

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 @TheMouse Try changing the outer wings to flat bottom.

    +1 11 months ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    10!
    13/5/24
    You people will upvote anything.

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,266 Subsere

    We did it...

    +1 1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @DatFiat126Guy19 I've literally not held this rank for even a day and I already outrank you.
    What the fuck

    +1 1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.8k YarisSedan

    @Graingy yooo welcome to plat grain

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @OrangeConnor2 What else is there to say?
    We did it.

    +1 1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @TalonTheCRTguy well that explains things.

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy I'm using voice typing tons of my screen broke

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @TalonTheCRTguy You are incredibly incoherent, you know that?

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    What you mean size and slowly

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy San Antonio

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    47.6k Graingy

    @TalonTheCRTguy
    1: The Greater Multiverse is under 14 billion Standard Multiverse Years old, so you must've been on a subtime system (Soian terminology, can't say I understand it).
    2: Say that again slowly.

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    Oh if you didn't then how did you use that spelled the meant to possible oh yeah you did you tell it's due to Mexico the frienprent

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy how do you know? Did you travel across multiple dimensions in the span of 5 trillion years all to this Dimension to search for CRT TVs yeah you didnt That's a classic win for me

    1.3 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments