Profile image

F-2.4 "Outline"

54.6k Graingy  1.7 years ago

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 19.4ft (5.9m)
  • Length 27.9ft (8.5m)
  • Height 8.9ft (2.7m)
  • Empty Weight 7,310lbs (3,315kg)
  • Loaded Weight 9,581lbs (4,345kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.876
  • Wing Loading 84.8lbs/ft2 (413.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 113.0ft2 (10.5m2)
  • Drag Points 1665

Parts

  • Number of Parts 49
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 250
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @RandomPlayer I don’t know if this happened or you reached 3 years first.

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    67 FUUUCKKK

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    If you want one, $2,500,000 USD.

    11 months ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @TheMouse honestly I can’t remember what my design process was tbh

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    68.8k TheMouse

    @Graingy
    You can make the same conclusion by just making the rear control surfaces smaller, but its just not as efficient.

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @TheMouse perhaps, but the whole reason this plane is so dogshit is that I kept overload off limits. Maybe adjust too? Idk, it was supposed to resemble something I had the tech to make back when I first started (just with more design sense).

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    68.8k TheMouse

    Not much really changed, as center of mass and lift was not the problem with this plane. I agree that it got slightly better, but not much. What would really make this more flyable is changing the control surfaces. The rear control surfaces need to have less of a max angle. The front (roll) ones need to be smaller.

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 What?
    No, it was more stable.

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy well you are a grain of sand maybe your skills got better

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 Odd, I could have sworn it got substantially more flyable?

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy no it flew worse

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 Did it not at least improve?

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy uhhh i tried

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @Talon7192 @TheMouse Try changing the outer wings to flat bottom.

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    10!
    13/5/24
    You people will upvote anything.

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,411 Subsere

    We did it...

    +1 1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @DatFiat126Guy19 I've literally not held this rank for even a day and I already outrank you.
    What the fuck

    +1 1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.5k YarisSedan

    @Graingy yooo welcome to plat grain

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @OrangeConnor2 What else is there to say?
    We did it.

    +1 1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @TalonTheCRTguy well that explains things.

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy I'm using voice typing tons of my screen broke

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @TalonTheCRTguy You are incredibly incoherent, you know that?

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    What you mean size and slowly

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.1k Guh

    @Graingy San Antonio

    1.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    54.6k Graingy

    @TalonTheCRTguy
    1: The Greater Multiverse is under 14 billion Standard Multiverse Years old, so you must've been on a subtime system (Soian terminology, can't say I understand it).
    2: Say that again slowly.

    1.7 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments