Profile image

Ju-188 E.1

12.0k GovernorG  1.8 years ago
Auto Credit Based on PlaneGuy01's JU-188 Finalized

In 1942, because the Ju 288 could not be put into production at this time, the prospects of the Ju 188 gradually became clear. At the same time, as the British Air Force and the Soviet Air Force gradually recovered, the Ju 88 at this time contained more luck in the mission. The German Aviation Ministry finally decided that a slightly improved new model based on the Ju 88B was worth a try, and asked Juncker to bring the improved version into production, which is now the Ju 188.The only Ju 88 E-0 model was modified for the armament system, with a 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 heavy machine gun firing downward and rearward in the belly area and an MG 131 heavy machine gun in the nose. Machine gun, rear-firing twin-fired 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 81Z machine gun mounted in the belly pod area. Two other airframes had their engines and outer wings removed to act as testbeds for water ditching, and were planned for use in Ju 188 as long-distance transoceanic flights against the British fleet. The fuselage of the second Ju 188 was modified from the Ju 88 A-4, and the trapezoidal vertical stabilizer surface was enlarged; the purpose was to increase the high-altitude flight control performance, requiring forward-looking performance like the Ju 88G. The Ju 88 V44 model later became the Ju 188 V1.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor JU-188 Finalized
  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +14 bonus
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 85.1ft (25.9m)
  • Length 58.6ft (17.9m)
  • Height 20.8ft (6.3m)
  • Empty Weight 34,407lbs (15,606kg)
  • Loaded Weight 40,109lbs (18,193kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.149
  • Wing Loading 40.6lbs/ft2 (198.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 988.9ft2 (91.9m2)
  • Drag Points 10443

Parts

  • Number of Parts 504
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 2,112
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    I personally think, that this is one of the best replicas i have seen.
    Thanks for it

    +1 1.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.8k PlaneGuy01

    @GovernorG hey do not delete it there is no problem

    +1 1.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k GovernorG

    @PlaneGuy01 And my apology again

    +2 1.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.0k GovernorG

    @PlaneGuy01 I'm sorry I didn't do this, but SP will automatically note the source of the reference, so dont worry, I think it will be clear to everyone that this is from your work.

    If you don't like other people making improvements on your work, I'll delete it. :)

    +2 1.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.8k PlaneGuy01

    for goodness sake man you didnt even ask permission but sure

    +3 1.8 years ago