@KorKaiorWhatever k fine hmpf
Then who do we send 10 trillion dollars to? What its not like we can just get rid of it?

@LettuceRob119 yep 👍
How was or is your day?

@SimplyElegant yep 👍

@LettuceRob119 no I was seriously doin’ dat.

@SimplyElegant local man fails to provide proper evidence for his arguments.
His response: troll

@KorKaiorWhatever
Cough Cough av——4

@LettuceRob119 I don’t know I was

Trolling

@SimplyElegant
The nuke rule is like one of the

F U N D E M E N T A L

Rules of the Duo World
It was made back when it consisted of my little brother and his friends and was drawn in art class (the orbital strike wasn't there, it was originally "if you use more than 2 nukes we invade capital")
It's one of the only reason the Duo world isn't on fire bc half of the members are literal psychopaths

@SimplyElegant im not defending the rule. Im just stating that "just hack the multi billion dollar highly classified advanced ICBM thats specifically designed to not be hacked in any which way even so trillions it feels has been spent in it to not do so" is not sound logic. Also trying to keep a nuke in orbit.. Is LITERALLY the SAME thing a SATELLITE does. Buh just keep the nuke up there. How? Oh yk like a satellite...
Love the logic here

@SimplyElegant please do explain, how hacking a Saturn 5 rocket at its climax is possible.

@LettuceRob119 (I didn’t say hit a satellite)
Also the whole rule of “use more than two nukes you will get orbital strikes” is not bright (sorry) because space rock go smash on multi BILLION DOLLAR TECHNOLOGY and hit your country.

@LettuceRob119 technically, hacking a Saturn 5 is possible.

@LettuceRob119 He he trolling

@KorKaiorWhatever
yes.

@SimplyElegant local man gets upset when other man uses free infinite knowledge, instead of classified documents and Russian propaganda sites. Lol
Also a satellite defense system is very usable especially in a FICTIONAL WORLD, take the rods from God project, or whatever it was called. Just as devastating as a nuke, but no fallout. Just crazy expensive, thats the only reason its not feasible.
Also no its a general rule of thumb, that you cant "hack" an ICBM. Its a MISSILE one that already knows where its going, before it even launches. Like ah yes "lemme just hack this Saturn 5 rocket" ahh logic 😭
And a ICBM most definitely cannot go into space to hit a satellite, idk where you got that from. But your wrong. ICBMs are ment to... hit the ground.. hence INTER-CONTINENTAL Ballistic Missile. Most rockets and assumed icbms will probably not have a booster or the capability to actively fight earth's orbit (once in space and on its final trajectory) to hit the equivalent of a needle point in football field. If you want to take out a satellite, just use pre existing equipment that already exist that can. Not some hack ICBM whats the point of that? Also how would you do that? Please explain? And note the tone here isn't an attack, genuinely trying to educate, and learn myself. Though just to clarify and equivalent to what you just said was, "you shouldn't use airplanes because the could hack a guided bomb, and shoot the already flying aircraft down"
Also sorry this is long, I dont mean to waste your time this much. Lol

@SimplyElegant
🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀

@KorKaiorWhatever that’s what she said

@SimplyElegant
most rocks are flat and have a large surface area to skim
most ICBMs are cylinder shaped

@KorKaiorWhatever also I am going to take that outta context

@KorKaiorWhatever skim it like a rock

@SimplyElegant
I looked at a Quora article
And Ik a tiny bit about orbit stuff
You can't rlly get into a stable orbit with 1 burst tho
You need one to get to the altitude
Then turn
Then another one to get into orbit
And most ICBMs aren't designed to do that
Also most ICBMs spread their load (don't tale that outta context)
Nuclear ones usually have a bunch of shells in them that spread in the air
So we'd havw to get it to not do that
But they'd still probably detonate
Also if it were to crash into the ocean
The radiation from the shells would probably seep into the water overtime

@KorKaiorWhatever or you can crash it into the ocean, and retrieve it.
Also ‘Google?’ That’s for source?

@SimplyElegant
Google says the largest ones can reach orbit
And they'd need a second stage to correct themselves into an orbit around the planet
Meaning if an ICBM wasn't designed to reach orbit, it won't

@KorKaiorWhatever they are.

@SimplyElegant
ICBMs aren't the only form of weapon launches
Nukes could be dropped from bombers
Also
I don't think ICBMs are rlly capable of entering orbit
So they'd just fall back down to the planet