No military until 1965? First of all even if 2 countries protect me they need more military spending, which could crash their economy. If I am a small country, I would accept the terms. Stay away on my land.
No.
Also I said no one is gonna give their territory up. Even colonies.
@RepublicofWrightIsles I completely disagree with that. Throwing off my military costs billions of dollars, even if they wanna cover the expenses their economy would crash. I have tens of thousands of military vehicles and I have 13.7 million troops. @Technicalstrat Please don't do it, if you think it would solve the problems, my country and your country would be poor in the future. Also I don't really rely on other countries.
@deutschFELLA man I just said don't Tread on you
@deutschFELLA yeah those terms are ass
@deutschFELLA the you agree…
Hey @Technicalstrat I finally agree with the terms. Just not the territorial changes and military.
@DeeganWithABazooka oh mb 💀
You do you, but I think that's actually Term 5, Term 4 is spin slightly reducing military budget.
Yeah! Don't Tread on B.E.!
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@SPWithLizzie
@voytek
@GeneralCorpInc
@Bugati87
@AviationLoverGEEK444
@BigHeadEngineering
@RB107
@Aeromax
@aMosquito
@Technicalstrat the parliament disagrees with the 4th term. The Bristolian Empire is a massive country.
@keiyronelleavgeek566
@RepublicofWrightIsles
@DeeganWithABazooka
@B1BLancer
@LunarEclipseSP