Profile image

Graingy Survey: Do You Ever Deliberately Build In Flaws?

44.1k Graingy  2 months ago

I don't just mean turning down the performance. Do you ever intentionally add poor design feature to your craft?

Stabilizers that can hit the ground if landing is poor? Unstable landing gear? Something else entirely?

I'm talking things that you could've very easily avoided without compromising your core design, but you left in purposefully.

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    To be clear, the reason I'd suspect someone would do this is because many aircraft aren't perfect. Many have quirks that have to be worked around.

    Pinned 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy ye

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I see. You built it, looked at its performance, and thought "yep, just what I was looking for."

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy no...I just wanted it to be kinda unstable in general

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You just intentionally built it poorly and took what you got?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy no

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I see.
    Did you specifically try to induce particular kinds of instability?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy yeah, since irl it never flew

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You intentionally made it unstable?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy it's at times unstable, and all and all just doesn't fly great

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 What's the flaw in it?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    my most upvoted plane yes

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    27.8k Strucker

    When it comes to most of my planes labelled with the “99s” company I genuinely make sure that it’s as terrible as possible. As in I ignore the performance of them and the only prerequisite is that it flies. But for an actual example my Moebius has the capability to fall flat on its front and cease functioning, and its design can cause a lot of death spiralling.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @DDVC that was intentional, yes?
    Wonderful example. Structural limitations.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    33.9k DDVC

    The wings on my D-75 can snap if you dive and fully pull the pitch. Unfortunately it only works on mobile and with low physics

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @XEPOH Pardon?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @THEOKPILOT See Me 163.
    Pilots had to be extremely careful with the thing, lest they either explode or be melted alive.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,242 THEOKPILOT

    @Graingy On purpose? Or for like combustion fuel efficiency reasons?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @THEOKPILOT I mean, some aircraft do use volatile fuel.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,242 THEOKPILOT

    I usually chuck a small bomb in a few things, don't pay in cash, you will pay in blood.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    11.5k SPWithLizzie

    The closest thing I do is compromising stability for sweet sweet turn speed

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy i never deliberately put flaws into my aircraft.
    if i do my aircraft would not even take off due to the already existing flaws

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @XEPOH If you intended me to see that, maybe consider not deleting every damn thing you say.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    44.1k Graingy

    @Boeing727200F Not what I meant.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    not intentionally, but most of my aircraft have a flaw in it that i just cant kink out. so i guess it is just a feature.

    2 months ago