Profile image

Graingy Survey: Opinions on Our Logo

52.0k Graingy  10 months ago

I've asked a similar question in the past more generally (whoever is willing to dig for the forum first gets an upvote*), but I've decided to ask this more generally.



2023 Official Design.


In your opinion, does this design work? Would you change anything? We're not necessarily looking to redesign, but are curious as to the thoughts and opinions of others.

Personally, I am skeptical of the black/grey contrast, and think it may not be sufficient to adequately make out the design within.

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    (*Unless we have beef, obviously)

    Pinned 10 months ago
  • Profile image
    23.9k Axartar

    @Graingy congrats on a new combination of words

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @Axartar Fruity Gay Arrow

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    23.9k Axartar

    @Graingy just think early 2000’s/90’s comedically over detailed web pages/apps

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @Axartar I can hardly imagine how that would look.
    ... Actually, I may have an idea, though it'd break with the style in some ways and would be too difficult to pull off.

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    23.9k Axartar

    @Graingy don't be close minded, true art may seem contradictory, I believe in you

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @Axartar That seems a bit excessive for a logo. It's a stamp, not a gallery painting.

    +1 10 months ago
  • Profile image
    23.9k Axartar

    @Graingy add some flames, a realistic plane, etc

    +1 10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @Axartar What would you suggest?
    The current one is a simplified, more mathematical version of the older designs which was eventually officially adopted.

    +1 10 months ago
  • Profile image
    23.9k Axartar

    Too minimalist, needs more detail

    +1 10 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy yep

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yep. Absolutely no smoothing required.
    At all.

    10 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy better yet, it’s great

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @Boeing727200F I mean, I guess. Only became official less than a year and a half ago, though.

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yeah, you're right, it is fine.
    Eugh. I feel like I've just sinned greatly...

    10 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy it’s fine

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @EnglishGarden Higher sided? You mean more sides?

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    52.0k Graingy

    @Numbers2 No.

    10 months ago
  • Profile image

    Nah its fine

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    2,434 Numbers2

    Just add 2 engines popping out like this

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    2,434 Numbers2

    Hmmmm lemme do something....

    10 months ago
  • Profile image

    Þ

    +3 10 months ago
  • Profile image

    make grey thingy a circle (or make a higher-sided polygon) and more vibrant red

    +2 10 months ago
  • Profile image

    You don’t need to change it, it is a classic and I’m fine with it

    +1 10 months ago