10.0k toxicgamer88 Comments

  • Thomas the TANK engine 1.7 years ago

    tommy the commie

    +10
  • Who is jim1the1squid? 15 days ago

    This post is sus

    +7
  • Lighter than Air 28 days ago

    sir, this is a videogame website

    +5
  • J-20 C Chengdu 2 months ago

    @MrBANZAI the wright brothers copied the f22 and thats a fact

    +5
  • TIE/LN Fighter 1.6 years ago

    @desiboy17 actually I am gonna prove you right

    +4
  • What's the most annoying thing you experience when building a plane? 1.7 years ago

    Moving parts getting attached to stuff they shouldnt

    +4
  • Design theft 8 months ago

    I will try to give an answer in all of your examples with my limited english skills so please be patient with me.
    Tu4 vs B29 partially correct. What the SU did exactly was to make exact copies of the one b29 they got their hands on and not just repaint a bunch of stolen b29s.
    Mig31 vs F-15
    First off the mig31 is an interceptor while the f15 is a fighter (totally different roles and so different designs to fulfill their asigned roles)
    F-15vs Su-27
    Those 2 are completely different i don't get how you concluded they are related.
    As for the su 57 looking similar with the f22 is more of how stealth works. To conclude, many aircraft may share similarities but thats
    More because of the laws of physics tjan because of "lazy" engineering. Hope my english was understandable.

    +3
  • How to land the second highest rated aircraft on SimplePlanes 1.7 years ago

    How I land in war thunder

    +3
  • Bedil bambu 14 days ago

    [citation needed]

    +2
  • Regular Dodecahedron one month ago

    poor maneuverabilty. where are the elevators?

    +2
  • Lockheed F-104G Starfighter 5 months ago

    Nice to see someone using the beacon technique. Far superior to the vtol nozzle one.
    Would advise you tho to add a few more in various sizes for better effect.

    +2
  • F-21 Faketor 5 months ago

    @DanDaFreakinMan yeah its based on the SF 1 Archon ultralight

    +2
  • How Can I turn parts invisible ????? 5 months ago

    Set their scale via xml to 0.0001

    +2
  • Offtop heresy. 5 months ago

    @RussianAce Judging by his behaviour, he doesnt seem older than 15 but anyway, i agree that insulting someone elses country just because you dont like them is not ok (assuming you are talking about the post about how Russia stole US technology) but creating forum posts to make fun of his reaction (both actions dont seem mature) or his popularity on a videogame is not the proper way to deal with it.

    +2
  • TIE interceptor 7 months ago

    would be cooler if you gave some credit for the parts you took from my build
    like the guns for example... or the wings on the tie fighter on the teaser picture
    (if you ever upload it)

    +2
  • He’s gone 9 months ago

    the supreme leader is dead

    +2
  • TIE-IN interceptor one year ago

    This is what i call a worthy successor

    +2
  • LEGO 7903 Rescue Helicopter 1.1 years ago

    Lego city is a dysfunctional city

    +2
  • The YB-60 (and B-36) in colour 1.7 years ago

    very nice

    +2
  • X -GHOST 1.7 years ago

    no seatbelts die like real man

    +2
  • Cursed images 1.8 years ago

    The earth is flat

    +2
  • Daredevil 1.8 years ago

    gg mine didnt even take off :/

    +2
  • Daredevil 1.8 years ago

    seems like we cant leave our vtol engines behind shame

    +2
  • D-9 Sopwith Llama 1.8 years ago

    i thought pride month was over

    +2
  • 1K Special Griffon 2000 1.9 years ago

    Looks and handles nicely its low part count too. It made a fine addition to my collection also congrats for 1k

    +2
  • Messerschmitt Me-262 A-1/a R-9 1.9 years ago

    The weapons hatch is a rare feature in most planes of the site good job!

    +2
  • Mirage 2000 5 331st Squadron 1.9 years ago

    @SanitaterAirlines silver masterrace

    +2
  • NAKAJIMA KI-43 III OTSU HAYABUSA(Oscar) v2.2 2.2 years ago

    its a shame its has only 2 upvotes

    +2
  • Aircraft 15 days ago

    You should have worked more on the flight model

    +1
  • Regular Icosahedron one month ago

    you should work more on the flight model. I suggest you increase throttle range in order to reduce its acceleration while also reducing the drag via xml. Aditionally a good idea would be to keep the wing loading realistic if you want an acceptable flight behaviour.
    Custom control surfaces would have been also nice

    +1
  • F/B Elyros AI one month ago

    @Gestour hope the +4 parts aint much of a problem

    +1
  • The BOOMERANG Wing 2 months ago

    @Kangy yeah i also want to build a YB-49 at some point

    +1
  • The Engine of the Titanic 2 months ago

    one small correction. the titanic had 1 reaction type parsons turbine turning the central shaft which also didnt have its own throttle control. Turbine speed relied solely on the throttle setting of the main reciprocating engines while it was also being "fed" by their exhaust steam.

    +1
  • PFU-51 Mursair 2 months ago

    yeet bois

    +1
  • Broken builds. 4 months ago

    Use the fuselage inlet block for moving parts as much as possible. Its almost the same as the normal fuselage block but it only has 2 attach points making it more difficult to jam with random stuff

    +1
  • AIM-9J speed build 4 months ago

    But does it know where it is?

    +1
  • Ki-61 Hien 5 months ago

    Underrated

    +1
  • Offtop heresy. 5 months ago

    Usually i don't like participating in internet drama but seeing a grown-ass man who claims to be a pathologist make fun of a kid on a videogame website doesn't seem quite right...

    +1
  • Echo, Echo! 6 months ago

    @MintLynx thus the harpoon was developed to counter them. Like harpooning a surfaced whale.
    Also

    Love the retractable radar covering in the conning tower its somwthing not many people know about

    +1
  • The sad truth about SimplePlanes 7 months ago

    I love democracy

    +1
  • Will the emperor be pleased? 7 months ago

    Ah competition!

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage 2000 5 Mk II 7 months ago

    @Weebsruinedthiswebsite black magic

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage 2000 5 Mk II 8 months ago

    @Jdlarkspur why does everybody have to make a comment about that???????

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage 2000 5 Mk II 8 months ago

    @Shippy456 2 corners set to circular, the other 2 set to smooth and then via xml add a - in the first digit of frontscale and rear scale

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage 2000 5 Mk II 8 months ago

    @ollielebananiaCFSP don't worry i didnt take your comment the bad way. i just wanted to give you an advice based on my personal experience about stuff you would like to see on the website. (hope you didnt take my comment the bad way either, my communication skills seem kinda poor)

    +1
  • TIE/LN Fighter 8 months ago

    @Kiwitostes thanks.
    its a few airbrakes with the maximum value set on a very high number, very easy actually

    +1
  • Flying at mach 2 - Mirage 2000 5 teaser 8 months ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle merci beacoup, mais c'est un jeu video non raison pour parle politique (sorry for my poor french i understand the language but i cant speak it fluently)

    +1
  • WWI Challenge: Cloudburst R Mk I -"Luftstreitkräfte" Livery 9 months ago

    The pictures you took dont serve it justice. Nice work

    +1
  • Airbus A320 neo 9 months ago

    Looks amazing but it has too many drag points. I suggest setting calculate drag to false in the xml editor for the details so that people with potato devices can run it and setting dragscale to 0 on the biggest parts in order to reduce the drag to increase its glide ratio

    +1
  • DG-808 Sailplane 9 months ago

    Very nice. Too bad it only has 4 upvotes i think you uploaded it too late

    +1