147k Pilotmario Comments

  • USS Missouri "Mighty Mo" (BB-63) - 1984 4.0 years ago

    @CoolPeach It's a nice ship. There's even a little plaque that marks where the surrender of Japan was signed.

    +7
  • SPVR - Fuselage Slice 3.2 years ago

    Would it be possible to create multiple holes with this?

    +4
  • Airborne Command Carrier Serenity 6.1 years ago

    Is this a Defender missile target?

    +4
  • Some of you may find this interesting 3.2 years ago

    .308 British

    I see a problem already.

    +3
  • U.S.S. Enterprise Bridge (Star Trek TOS) 4.6 years ago

    Note to others: Wearing a red shirt here will place you in significant peril.

    +3
  • M985 VULCAWS 5.4 years ago

    OH CRAP. @Mmdben

    +3
  • Junkers Ju-52/3m g5e Airliner (dettagliato) 5.8 years ago

    Aunt Ju's looking pretty, even in old age.

    +3
  • The New Republic of SimpleLandia 6.2 years ago

    @Strikefighter04 Also, your authority over members was quite limited.

    It was a rogue member who got Simplelandia in a war you never wanted.

    So yeah.

    +3
  • CedCo C12 MPV Scout 6 months ago

    @Cedy117 It's been awhile lol.

    +2
  • Brot Type C Battlecruiser 5.2 years ago

    I’m kinda curious as to how well it would fare against my old North Point.

    I’d give it to this, since while neither ship has armor that can realistically hope to stop the other’s shells, this has bigger guns.

    On second thought the Salem-class missile cruiser conversions would likely blow it out of the water on the basis of a large number of anti-shipping missiles. @Feanor

    +2
  • ''Augustin'' type destroyer 5.7 years ago

    @engineer40k lol if you wanted a more American DD, here’s a simple way how:
    1) Identify areas of the deck which are open.
    2) Cram the biggest AA gun you can put there.

    +2
  • MQ-20 Rapid 6.1 years ago

    Dat landing gear tho...

    +2
  • Lepidopterus 6.3 years ago

    @SledDriver What do you mean, "this is not a replica?"

    Everyone knows that butterflies have air-to-ground missiles and plasma cannons. ;)

    +2
  • Wright Bay Incident 6.4 years ago

    @Strikefighter04 Well you best ask your members as to who decided to declare war on us.

    +2
  • Island-class patrol boat 6.6 years ago

    @phanps Thanks!

    +2
  • SP International Council Discord 6.8 years ago

    @Carsong1017 Sure!

    +2
  • Airbus A420 7.8 years ago

    Is this the Airbus 420 because this bus goes high?

    +2
  • Lockheed C-130 Hercules 7.9 years ago

    Permission to modify?

    +2
  • Funky Trees Missile Demonstrator 2 months ago

    @HariTheSnakk Of course.

    +1
  • M113A8 Aero-gavin 1.6 years ago

    @HermanTheGermanSherman
    Right here, at 4:25

    +1
  • Gun Challenge 1.6 years ago

    @Tohu Well, I do have a couple of entries…

    +1
  • Gun Challenge 1.6 years ago

    @Tohu Understandable, though I do feel the limit where it sits is extremely limiting in the potential of the entries.

    +1
  • Gun Challenge 1.6 years ago

    Though I could simply XML away drag calculations, if that helps with performance issues.

    +1
  • Gun Challenge 1.6 years ago

    @Tohu Impressive, though I was thinking of something a bit more complex in mind.

    +1
  • Gun Challenge 1.6 years ago

    Question: Does it need to be mechanically functional, or is a static model okay?

    Also, can there be a much higher maximum part count, or exceptions thereof? I do not believe I can make a satisfactory entry with such few parts.

    +1
  • Gun Challenge 1.6 years ago

    @YuukaNeko

    +1
  • Emmerian Air Force Roundel 2.0 years ago

    Nice.

    +1
  • UDC UCC-300, .300 BLK Carbine 2.1 years ago

    Hmm... I should re-do the AR-15 Contractor.

    +1
  • M108A2 Jeep 2.4 years ago

    @KerlonceauxIndustries Thanks!

    +1
  • Remaster Challenge [CLOSED] 2.5 years ago

    Perfect timing.

    +1
  • 14.5" MK16 AR-15, Civilian Fighting Rifle 2.7 years ago

    @YuukaNeko I do have a PEQ-15 clone lol. Most impressive are the wires tho.

    +1
  • 14.5" MK16 AR-15, Civilian Fighting Rifle 2.7 years ago

    This... this is a fine work of art. Especially the DBAL and the optics.

    Now I have to release my tactical'd AR. Though given my model's strictly military use, it'd have some things like that third pin.

    Say, you wouldn't mind if I nabbed a few things like the charging handle and the DBAL, would you? @YuukaNeko

    +1
  • 14.5" MK16 AR-15, Civilian Fighting Rifle 2.7 years ago

    How'd I miss this gem?

    +1
  • H&K MP5 Simulator 2.7 years ago

    Wait is that my old MP5 build?

    +1
  • M2100 Humvee 3.8 years ago

    @Chancey21 The hill-climbing abilities is mostly due to how SP handles motors. In order to give it a semblance of realistic acceleration on flatter terrains, the engine had to be tweaked.

    I will be linking an unlisted stripped-down vehicle for those who want a Humvee that performs like a seal in the water, than a seal on land.

    +1
  • Funky Trees Missile Demonstrator 4.5 years ago

    Thanks! @KerlonceauxIndustries

    +1
  • Cruise Missile - Beta 4.6 years ago

    The HSLAM: My time has come.

    +1
  • RNZAF Boeing 727-100 QC 4.8 years ago

    Question: can the rear air-stair be deployed mid-flight? Just wondering.

    +1
  • LRV-30 4.8 years ago

    @Zanedavid Thanks. It should be noted they tend to generate a lot of smoke once hit by something more potent than standard ammunition from an AK-47, ball ammo from anything 7.62mm NATO, or anything short of M995 from an M16.

    +1
  • USS Halibut 4.8 years ago

    Nice sub.

    Oh btw Vault is essentially lying about everything on that post and he’s blocked me so I can’t defend myself on that post.

    I never made death threats or threatened to doxx anyone. That is a complete lie.

    Just to let you know so you don’t get the wrong impression of me.

    +1
  • OUTDATED: Input System Explanation & Tutorial ("Funky Trees") [SP 1.9] 4.8 years ago

    Gotta give the devs credit for making me use what I learned in math class. @SnoWFLakE0s

    +1
  • Albacore-class SSN 4.9 years ago

    I have no interest in supplying these vessels to non-IDA states. Carry on.

    @TheFantasticTyphoon @Parshainaerospace

    +1
  • BAE Hawk 127 5.0 years ago

    I thought they got Phantoms for awhile because the USAF was working out the bugs in the F-111. When the F-111s were delivered, the Phantoms were returned to the USAF. @Alta2809

    +1
  • Brot Type C Battlecruiser 5.2 years ago

    That is true. As mentioned though, the North Point would likely die horribly if the action was in good visibility, in open seas, and where the North Point couldn’t simply run away. @BlazeInfinity

    +1
  • Brot Type C Battlecruiser 5.2 years ago

    @BlazeInfinity It may have radar if that ball ahead of the main rangefinder is a radar unit, but it's likely a basic search-type or fire control radar if that's the case.

    +1
  • Brot Type C Battlecruiser 5.2 years ago

    @BlazeInfinity
    Well that was kind of the point of battlecruisers in the first place. Namely, as cruiser stompers.

    The North Point does have radar that would allow it to simply lay smoke or dive into the nearest rain squall or patch of bad weather, flip on the radar aim/wallhacks, and deliver a hail of accurate 8” armor-piercing shells while the battlecruiser sits there wondering where the stream of 8” shells are coming from.

    It also has a slight speed advantage, but that would mostly be useful to run away from a very lopsided fight. Which it may not be able to do, especially if it is a screening force as cruisers tend to be.

    But if the North Point can’t find a suitable blob of cover or weather to obscure visibility but allow the use of superior radar-directed fire control to deliver the death of a thousand cuts, then the death of the North Point by 16” naval gun is all but assured.

    +1
  • Creeper 5.2 years ago

    @AerialFighterSnakes You'd have to craft that shotgun.

    Also you'd need to get the gunpowder for the shotgun, and you get gunpowder from killing creepers.

    Sooo... yeah.

    +1
  • Anbessa 2M2 APEX 5.2 years ago

    @Dastin Vicky Jr.

    +1
  • ''Augustin'' type destroyer 5.7 years ago

    Beautiful early/mid 20th century destroyer.

    Looks reasonably capable too. Four 5" dual-purpose guns to destroy anything that floats or flies, eight torpedo tubes to give cruisers something to think about, and depth charges to give submarines something to think about. Even a few medium-caliber AA guns to dissuade all but the most kamikaze-minded pilots.

    A destroyer of this size and firepower would be quite a good design for its time. A bit on the smaller side, but not something to be disregarded, and certainly capable of holding its own.

    +1
  • San Diego-class MRAS 5.7 years ago

    Neat. @Spikerya

    +1