@Strucker I agree with One2, lol.
Youve been building pure garbage for months on end, and you get offended or "shocked" at every little bit of critisism given to you, you deny the opportunity to use said critisism to improve and you'd rather deny it altogether and act passive aggressive, only 3 letters to describe my feelings about you is literally: "smh."
@Chaka I love your mom. she is an amazing woman. Way underrated by many. It was the precursor to the modern day Andrea and Jessica(of whom are your sisters). Which, I am sure you already knew.
Also, she's more than a woman. she's a way of life. Me and her then and now are a tight knit family that "flies"(wink), dies, eats, cooks, sleeps, and parties together. The milf community isn't anything like it.
Solar, Also, that isnt the point of One2's original comment either, People like you can't and won't take critisism to improve, whilst spamming builds, leaving people with high effort builds in the shadows.
@AeroAeroTheMen I uh.. I get that, i guess. I can't say I'm the greatest, and I was worse at some point, you learn with exposure, to aircraft, to information, to people with more information too, I wish you the best of luck, but after a while you would fall into a state where you can instinctually tell what feels realistic and fun at the same time, and realism isn't certainly the only thing you should strive for in an aircraft. You'll get the hang of it, I think c:
@GuyFolk It's a spectrum, not a direct distinction, to be honest, I really dislike this F4's flight model, although the craft itself looks great, low speed (and high speed for that matter) manueverability and max AoA values are severely lacking, and flaps have an unrealistic impact on the flight performance.
I do not think this is realistic or fun to fly, from a flight model perspective, I'd like to point out that my intent is not to insult but to potentially help you make better flight models in the future, I do not know what you based your flight model off of(I mean as in which stats) but looking at G-Force and Angle of Attack values I can clearly see both values are too low at any given speed I tested it at, I'd like for you to look into making specific types of airfoils and maybe look into how you can integrate higher angle of attack into your flight models, you still get an upvote from me, just because of how well made the model is. Cheers.
Why are you promoting hostility towards criticisms and why do you not want stuff that will literally improve your builds?
no one is "disrespecting your effort"
its literally words to try to make you better, don't be so hostile against it.
WiiMini fans waiting for wiimini kinda cringe
+9Features aren't a measure of how good something is, it's literally "mods doing what they want" sit your ass down
+5@Strucker I agree with One2, lol.
+5Youve been building pure garbage for months on end, and you get offended or "shocked" at every little bit of critisism given to you, you deny the opportunity to use said critisism to improve and you'd rather deny it altogether and act passive aggressive, only 3 letters to describe my feelings about you is literally: "smh."
god moothafugen damn
+4@CharlesDeGaulle I cannot hear you over the sound of your surrender flag flapping.
They're all a god damn joke. Get over it.
+4why.
+3@Chaka I love your mom. she is an amazing woman. Way underrated by many. It was the precursor to the modern day Andrea and Jessica(of whom are your sisters). Which, I am sure you already knew.
+3Also, she's more than a woman. she's a way of life. Me and her then and now are a tight knit family that "flies"(wink), dies, eats, cooks, sleeps, and parties together. The milf community isn't anything like it.
'Tis but a scratch in the almighty reality that is time
+3Solar, Also, that isnt the point of One2's original comment either,
+3People like you can't and won't take critisism to improve, whilst spamming builds, leaving people with high effort builds in the shadows.
@Sovietstrike333
+3@SodiumChloride
everything has fallen behind her including you
+3hah
Did you analyze the font to get it perfectly right?
+3(Since you said math I assumed that)
You should've stopped posting SU30s a looooooooong time ago
+2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXEkhvkmda0
+2they are speaking enchantment table
+2@Lazer22 You cannot in SP, lol
+2@tsampoy
+2@CashewCashewisacoolcat
@chibikitsune
I like fixed wing aircraft but this is a pleasant surprise.
+2Kenneth help I cant feel my mouth
+2dentist went brrrrrrt
By the way, hey Devs, can we get "targetdata" xml data please?
+2as in their position relative to us, distance, speed.
It takes me 4 years to load
+2@SwiftFoxe I was actually thinking of a Turkish Phantom,
+2Türk'üz, Cumhuriyetin göğsümüz tunç siperi, Türk'e durmak yaraşmaz!
@Ismat On PC you can use designersuite to cheese the system.
+2@hRmm aslan tabi öyle olcak
+1@AeroAeroTheMen I uh.. I get that, i guess. I can't say I'm the greatest, and I was worse at some point, you learn with exposure, to aircraft, to information, to people with more information too, I wish you the best of luck, but after a while you would fall into a state where you can instinctually tell what feels realistic and fun at the same time, and realism isn't certainly the only thing you should strive for in an aircraft. You'll get the hang of it, I think c:
+1@GuyFolk It's a spectrum, not a direct distinction, to be honest, I really dislike this F4's flight model, although the craft itself looks great, low speed (and high speed for that matter) manueverability and max AoA values are severely lacking, and flaps have an unrealistic impact on the flight performance.
I do not think this is realistic or fun to fly, from a flight model perspective, I'd like to point out that my intent is not to insult but to potentially help you make better flight models in the future, I do not know what you based your flight model off of(I mean as in which stats) but looking at G-Force and Angle of Attack values I can clearly see both values are too low at any given speed I tested it at, I'd like for you to look into making specific types of airfoils and maybe look into how you can integrate higher angle of attack into your flight models, you still get an upvote from me, just because of how well made the model is. Cheers.
+1Why are you promoting hostility towards criticisms and why do you not want stuff that will literally improve your builds?
+1no one is "disrespecting your effort"
its literally words to try to make you better, don't be so hostile against it.
This is so stupid, how come you have literally no one to attend but it's closed lol
+1WHERE IS SOOT
+1These tutorials make me wanna not do anything because I already make planes
+1Dont thank everyone who upvotes lmao
+14 refrigerators/ 2 bananas, would consume again
+1@WiiRemote Im not gonna ask you who Im gonna be mean to, sit down or get out.
+1@Strucker gee strucker, you probably should, lmao
+1@WiiRemote Shut up for god's sakes, if you don't like the "drama" I create, then leave.
+1I wanted to speak my truth and I did.
@KnightOfRen Strucker and I have a long-lasting dispute, it gets personal.
+1@PointlessWhyshouldi Of course!
+1@jamesPLANESii Thanks for feedback, I will nudge it out a meter or so
I'd love to collab w you sometime, lets make it happen
+1edgi
+1Commie teddies
+1Can I also get pinned ,( ･ั﹏･ั)
+1Good job!
+1the tail is a deadly razor
+1ew
+1@Anastvats Bruv forgot to give u ctedit, but now I did :)
+1@soundwave er no dont use the engine please
+1@ThomasRoderick You catch up to the bullets
+1@SodiumChloride thanks mr. salt
+1@EngineerOtaku Its a joke lol.
+1@One2 part count go BRRRRRRRRRRR
+1