@MrGreen
Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
Thank you for your comment.
I am using this image as a reference for this work.
Do you mean the aircraft of 355 Squadron is the one in this image?
@BogdanX
Thank you very much for your kind advice. You are certainly right, if I drop the scale of the wing parts down to 0.1, they will no longer appear to pop out. I will keep this in mind as a reference.
@SemedianIndustries
Yourlocalhuman's comment made me a little depressed that he didn't give me a good or bad review of my work. In that sense, I thank you for speaking for me.
@Yourlocalhuman
I don't mind that you were just stating the facts. However, I am thinking of posting the P-51D next, so instead of pointing out that the plane exists in stock, I would be happy if you would download it, fly it in your skies, rate it if you think it is good, and point out any improvements you think are needed.
That's all.
@L0RR3B0RR3
Thank you for your comment.
As you pointed out, this aircraft is prone to stall due to rapid pitch-up during low-speed flight. ...I tried various balance adjustments, etc., but it seems they were insufficient. I will try to improve it in my next work.
@Dragoranos
Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
@xNotDumb
I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@Killer123562
Thank you for your compliments and appreciation. You compliment me a little too much and I am embarrassed.
There are many players of this game who create amazing works. I hope you will enjoy the works of various players and vote in favor of them. I will do the same.
@PapaKernels
Thanks for the advice! I will try to see what kind of flying model I can get with the wing shape as it is on the actual aircraft.
Thanks. Your A-3 looks nice and realistic with the timing of the landing gear folding :)
@JustDragon
@Kangy
@Kittyhawk208
@Oxen
Thank you for your comments.
I will continue to do my best to create good works.
By the way, I have been working on this piece from the beginning. This is the first time I submitted it.
@Jaspy190
Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@Jaspy190
Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@JustLookingForFriends
Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
@MrGreen
+4Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+3Thank you for your comment.
I am using this image as a reference for this work.
Do you mean the aircraft of 355 Squadron is the one in this image?
@asteroidbook345
+2Oh my, you're Japanese-American? I'm glad you have close roots :)
It is very frustrating, but your Ki-100 is far more beautiful and complete than my work. It's a great piece of work! :)
+2@WhoflerMan
+2Thank you! It was worth all the hard work I put into it.
@Sergio666
+2Thanks a lot!
@WolfHunter9111
+2Thanks for the comment. I'm glad you say so :)
@BogdanX
+2Thank you very much for your kind advice. You are certainly right, if I drop the scale of the wing parts down to 0.1, they will no longer appear to pop out. I will keep this in mind as a reference.
@MikuisNOTaboi
+2Thanks for your comment!
@shipfinder568
+2Thanks for following my account. I also understood for the first time how it works, that users without points cannot upvote. Thank you.
@SemedianIndustries
+2Yourlocalhuman's comment made me a little depressed that he didn't give me a good or bad review of my work. In that sense, I thank you for speaking for me.
@Yourlocalhuman
I don't mind that you were just stating the facts. However, I am thinking of posting the P-51D next, so instead of pointing out that the plane exists in stock, I would be happy if you would download it, fly it in your skies, rate it if you think it is good, and point out any improvements you think are needed.
That's all.
@L0RR3B0RR3
+2Thank you for your comment.
As you pointed out, this aircraft is prone to stall due to rapid pitch-up during low-speed flight. ...I tried various balance adjustments, etc., but it seems they were insufficient. I will try to improve it in my next work.
@MrGreen
+2Aah! So that's what the name means! I think it is a wonderful name to honor the brave Jevadaiah. He even went to the ISS recently :)
@Dragoranos
+2Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
@xNotDumb
+2I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
+2Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@Kangy
+2Thank you for your comment!
@Killer123562
+2Thank you for your compliments and appreciation. You compliment me a little too much and I am embarrassed.
There are many players of this game who create amazing works. I hope you will enjoy the works of various players and vote in favor of them. I will do the same.
@99807
+2Thank you! I'm glad you like it.
@SyntheticL
+2Thank you for your comments.
I see! I never played War Thunder, so I didn't know that, but it is a tough one to make enemies with.
@Kangy
+2Thanks for the advice!
I will try different things in SP to see how the flight characteristics change depending on the wing shape.
@PapaKernels
+2Thanks for the advice! I will try to see what kind of flying model I can get with the wing shape as it is on the actual aircraft.
Thanks. Your A-3 looks nice and realistic with the timing of the landing gear folding :)
@Kangy
+2Thank you!
...I always wonder how much maneuverability I should have in my aircraft.... I will look into it and try it out in the future.
@GrentonAircraftCo
+2Thanks for letting me know. I have added in the description section that you flew this plane in VR.
@SimplyPlain
+2Thanks for the comment! Glad you like it :)
@Alisuchanka
+2Thank you! Indeed. But I think your modeling and painting is far more beautiful and realistic :)
@TatsuTheOtaku
+2@JuliusCeasor98
Thanks!
@GrentonAircraftCo
Thanks for the comment. As beenz said, I don't know if this will work in VR. Sorry.
@CheckOneTwo
+2Thanks for your comment!
@JustDragon
+2@Kangy
@Kittyhawk208
@Oxen
Thank you for your comments.
I will continue to do my best to create good works.
By the way, I have been working on this piece from the beginning. This is the first time I submitted it.
@ChamDel78
+1Thanks for making the new version. It's quite avant-garde :)
@OTOjustGoose
+1Thank you so much!
@HR
+1Thank you! I'm glad you like it.
Modern cars are cool, but I think old cars have beautiful curves :)
@asteroidbook345
+1Indeed.
Even I, a Japanese, think so.
@Jaspy190
+1Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@MikuisNOTaboi
+1Thanks for the comment.
Ah, Betty. That sounds interesting too.
@Jaspy190
+1Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
+1Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@Jaspy190
+1Thanks a lot!
I would like to make the Ki-100 as well.
@ShinyGemsBro
+1Thanks for the comment :)
@botto28
+1Thankyou!
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you! Thanks also for the request. I will consider it.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you! The windows are the part I was particular about :)
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Aah! Yes, okay, you mean this one? Okay, I don't know if I can do it well, but I will try to make it.
@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for your comments. I am also pleased that you have tested and evaluated my planes.
@shipfinder568
+1Thank you for your comment. Thank you for fighting with the plane I built :)
As someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I give you the upvote.
+1@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for getting back to me.
Uh...I may have misunderstood the intent of your statement. My apologies.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you for your comment.
No problem, you may use the machine gun mount section.