Thanks To Kenx¹7eth For Photos

DeezDucks for testing and telling me not to play with pots and pans

Edensk for help with FT and testing (Same thing about pots and pans)

And CoolPeach who tried to test but sadly only got 1FPS

Thanks to F104Deathtrap for testing and was the one who found out it had spoilers!

Thanks to p0tato72 for testing





IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE

AG8
AG2 WAIT 2 SECONDS
AG3 SAME AS 2
Controls Normal

AG5 + TRIM FOR RUDDER TRIM

AG7 + TRIM FOR NORMAL TRIM
VTOL slider up for VTOL + TRIM FOR LANDING

Takeoff speed: 150mph (273kph)
Landing speed: 140 - 160mph (225-257kph)

Stall speed: Unknown

Do not deploy flaps above 175mph (281kph) or deploy gear above 220mph (354kph)

I also permanently borrowed parts off of MrSilverwolf
And check out Sm10684 he helped with the R340 wasp majors
If you roll extremely hard for a long period the wings will snap off
If your PC is not nasa grade click here

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 101.8ft (31.0m)
  • Length 67.0ft (20.4m)
  • Height 24.3ft (7.4m)
  • Empty Weight 31,778lbs (14,414kg)
  • Loaded Weight 43,505lbs (19,733kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.291
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.16
  • Wing Loading 10.9lbs/ft2 (53.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 3,977.0ft2 (369.5m2)
  • Drag Points 1516

Parts

  • Number of Parts 4332
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    32.6k SodiumIodide

    Honestly rookie number part count

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    31.9k CRJ900Pilot

    Super cool design! This is the best XF-11 on the site, by far. There are a few problems though. Firstly, I'd just like to say this is constructive criticism and I mean no hard feelings. That being said, lets begin:
    - It can't track straight on the runway. I would imagine this has to do with either the cockpit, or not building with 0 mass and drag parts from the beginning. That, coupled with the slow nose wheel and nothing to reduce its effect at high speed, makes it hard to keep straight on takeoff and landing.
    - There are gaps, almost everywhere. Most notably on the gear doors, but there are many areas that can be smoothed out more
    - Part efficiency, or lack thereof. While the custom engines and props are cool, they aren't needed. 128 parts for just the prop blades(can be done with 4) probably 400 parts for each engine (can be done with 2) , 20 parts for the exhaust pipes alone (can be done in less than 5), probably 250 parts for each roundel (can be done in maybe 50 at most), 20 parts for black lines on spoilers (can be done in 2), 400 parts for gauges you cant even see as they're behind the seat, etc...
    - Smaller details are neglected. There is part of the glass canopy showing into the nose wheel well. There are hinges connected to nothing in the main gear wells. Intakes lead to nowhere. There should have been a solid black wall in there to simulate depth. There's a random fuselage hanging off the back of the left boom?
    - Flight performance. It turns better than most fighters. Keep in mind this plane was bigger than the Lockheed Constellation, shown in this picture yet it turns faster than a P-51. No wonder the wings break off so easily. Speaking off, that's another not needed feature. It complicated the whole plane, and adds parts to the wing as you have to build two that are connected, rather than just one big wing.
    - Paint. It's very bland. It's hard to tell from pictures as they are mostly black and white, but from the few color pictures, the plane is more of a grey/aluminum color, not white. A few ticks darker in the paint menu, and a touch more metallic would've fixed this. Also, the engine is painted white, which makes it hard to notice it. Plus its all white, so its even harder to notice the 400+ parts worth of detail
    I feel bad for critiquing so much, I can only imagine how much effort you put into this build. I estimate tha

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Jundroo : makes a game where people will be able to share builds
    HappyFeetWhyshouldi : ok let's make a 4000 parts plane

    ok so let's be serious two minutes, the build is awesome, it does look like the real plane, details are unbelievable just as the custom landing gears, spoilers, control surfaces ect....This build is for sure really REALLY good. BUT there are some flaws : first the part count (yes some people will say "blablabla it's not that bad" but it is !) I know there is a lot of details and custom parts but absolutely NO PART ECONOMY ! Which is a shame for a plane with this ammount of details, for exemple in your jauges each line is ONE part, but you can make two and up to four lines with one part...Also the tail doesn't really look like how it should where the fuselage and the vertical stabilizer meet which is unfortunate for a build of this quality. (And I'm going to say it again, so much parts is great to show what you can do, it's like a piece of art, but high part count doesn't mean good build)
    However don't think that I find your build bad, it's magnificent ! Better than a lot of builds :))

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Forty-three thirty-two

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    cheeseburger

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    82.2k Hedero

    That number, it scary me

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,334 Shippy456

    Caught your name change! @PoinX25tlessWhyShouldI

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    Ok @JamesieMcPlanesieThe2st

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    165k AN2Felllla

    I mean there's detail and then there's just making things from a gazillion parts for no reason...
    I mean this is pretty good but I could have made something of equal level of detail (maybe slightly simplified gauges) from about 1500 parts.
    There's a reason most video games have a rendering system...

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,687 zazy

    rip my pc

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,346 Stanmich

    I'm saying now, this may be more detailed than the 172S.

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    What kind of quantum computer ∞tb RAM iPad are you using?!

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    My phone is shaking in fear.

    3 months ago
  • Profile image
    10.9k shipster

    I think I know who won the competition...you brought a nuke to a watergun fight

    3 months ago
  • Profile image
    120 Wisely

    Is my iPad nasa grade? No but I will Experiment and see if my iPad can Handle this also this is beautiful and awesome looking nice job

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    @kenneth_ did these pictures. @Aweyer26

    +2 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    3,095 Aweyer26

    idk how you get the ray tracing working so well. What effects are you using for these pictures @PoinX25tlessWhyShouldI

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    I’m sorry. :( @NaONCo2HCH2

    3 months ago
  • Profile image
    17.0k Chaka

    Too many parts to be played by the majority. But, I still upvoted

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    RTX ON!

    3 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,451 Madness

    bro u deserve more than 1k votes :D

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Cool! @CRJ900Pilot

    3 months ago
  • Profile image
    31.9k CRJ900Pilot

    @PoinX25tlessWhyShouldI I do, its CRJ900Pilot#6712

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    -takeoff- could be due to connections
    -roll- yes it has great roll however the wings do snap off the only reason I’ve added this is because I don't like FT so much and it most likely was a hard plane to fly and want it to try to be realistic and harsh on the pilot
    -I like to put detail so no way im degrading the part count lol (I do do lower more part efficient builds but I just love detail so much)
    -gaps- im so sorry I’ve been trying to attempt smooth panelling my next build will be 10x better I hope
    -paint- the XF-11 1 was pure white and black the prototype 2 was the one with a slight aluminium colour

    Don’t be sorry for critiquing im very glad you did!, it will be able to help me grow as a builder.

    Also do you have discord? @CRJ900Pilot

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    The aircraft is correct in size as well as the props, it could just look smaller because of the angle the photos were taken at. @Starbound

    3 months ago
  • Log in to see more comments