Profile image

Boeing 767-300ER Heavy (LATAM Airlines)

169k MAPA  3 days ago
Auto Credit Based on MAPA's Magic Form

This aircraft follows all the basic requirements to be automatically spawned by the AI. She is able to take off and land safely at the game's main airports. it is also a playable aircraft, you can enjoy aerial collisions, target shooting or Just enjoy more realistic and diverse air traffic in the game.

About the Aircraft: by Wikipedia

The 767-300ER, the extended-range version of the 767-300, entered service with American Airlines in 1988. The type's increased range was made possible by greater fuel tankage and a higher MTOW of 407,000 lb (185,000 kg). Design improvements allowed the available MTOW to increase to 412,000 lb (187,000 kg) by 1993. Power is provided by Pratt & Whitney PW4000, General Electric CF6, or Rolls-Royce RB211 engines. The 767-300ER comes in three exit configurations: the baseline configuration has four main cabin doors and four over-wing window exits, the second configuration has six main cabin doors and two over-wing window exits; and the third configuration has six main cabin doors, as well as two smaller doors that are located behind the wings. Typical routes for the type include New York to Frankfurt.

The combination of increased capacity and range for the -300ER has been particularly attractive to both new and existing 767 operators. It is the most successful 767 version, with more orders placed than all other variants combined. As of November 2017, 767-300ER deliveries stand at 583 with no unfilled orders. There were 376 examples in service as of July 2018. The type's main competitor is the Airbus A330-200. At its 1990s peak, a new 767-300ER was valued at $85 million, dipping to around $12 million in 2018 for a 1996 build.

Screenshots

Reference Image:

Credit: AERO Magazine - UOL

Thank you for your attention, Good flight :D

MAPA Aviation 2024.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Magic Form
  • Successors 2 airplane(s) +182 bonus
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 258.8ft (78.9m)
  • Length 282.0ft (85.9m)
  • Height 83.6ft (25.5m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 17,725lbs (8,040kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 7.606
  • Wing Loading 26.6lbs/ft2 (129.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 666.7ft2 (61.9m2)
  • Drag Points 3263

Parts

  • Number of Parts 83
  • Control Surfaces 11
  • Performance Cost 503
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    46.3k Apollo018362

    YESS I AM THE FIRST

    Pinned 3 days ago
  • Profile image
    169k MAPA

    Special thanks to @Apollo018362 for all images provided

    Pinned 3 days ago
  • Profile image

    To those who think the plane was involved 9/11....

    youre wrong

    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    Oh yes! A 767! We can finally make an E-767 with this

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image

    I know you aren’t doing requests anymore, but could you at least try the 737?

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @MAPA ooooh maybe a blue panorama 767?

    3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @MAPA allright ty :D

    3 days ago
  • Profile image
    169k MAPA

    @CaptainBrayden Not long, I'll do it soon ;)

    3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @MAPA sorry to bother you but can we start the 737s?

    3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @MAPA ty

    3 days ago
  • Profile image
    91.2k L1nus

    @GuardianAerospace just as I was saying about scale, you can also be scaled and AI at the same time so I don't see why the purpose of it has to do with scale

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @L1nus you are right, I do not know you that well however i just want to state the purpose of this plane.

    3 days ago
  • Profile image
    169k MAPA

    @Inuyasha8215 Don't worry, we've made up and everything is fine now. Let's just move on and forget all this ;)
    L1nus is a very nice and kind guy, I really admire his work

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @MAPA He's just asking you to properly scale your airliners, not asking you to model all the details and systems from real airliners.

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image
    91.2k L1nus

    @GuardianAerospace you don't know me that well apparently

    +2 3 days ago
  • Profile image
    91.2k L1nus

    @MAPA i wasn't asking for total realism MAPA, i was asking for some sense of scale

    +2 3 days ago
  • Profile image
    169k MAPA

    @L1nus Friend, if realism is so important to you, why don't you play Ifinite Flight Simulator or X-Planes, because here you won't find realism

    3 days ago
  • Profile image
    169k MAPA

    @GuardianAerospace Ha yeah, thanks man. In the end the important thing is to have fun 🤓

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @L1nus but I do see your point. You could maybe relax a bit though? It’s not that important honestly.

    3 days ago
  • Profile image

    @MAPA Bro, scale doesn't matter unless you’re some overly obsessed avgeek or person trying to be different. “I make sure my planes are *ahem,* up to date and scale. 🤓☝️“ you don’t have to listen to @L1nus because he clearly does not understand what it mean to have fun in a video game. These planes are designed for AI and not for realism. You’re all good MAPA! :D

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image
    9,770 Christiant2

    Air Canada? Please?

    3 days ago
  • Profile image
    91.2k L1nus

    @MAPA even if it's the shortest doesn't matter my point still stands, you have no sense of scale is what i'm saying, i don't like when people make so many excuses for something so simple in concept, AI is also not effected by scale so it doesn't hurt to make them to scale

    +2 3 days ago
  • Profile image

    MAPA I HAVE HANDS I CAN'T DO SO MUCH AIRPLANE PAINTING

    +1 3 days ago
  • Profile image
    169k MAPA

    @L1nus Let's stop here, we're not going to get anywhere with all of this. I'm a big fan of yours and I don't want to lose a friend

    3 days ago
  • Profile image
    169k MAPA

    @L1nus 84,8? But this is from my 747-SP, the shortest of all...

    3 days ago
  • Log in to see more comments