Profile image

Tupolev Tu-22KD

30.9k EngineerOtaku  9 days ago

And now back to our regularly scheduled Soviet aircraft binge! Made this in the same timeframe as the Tornado when I was getting frustrated with it among a bunch of other airplanes. I also dropped an impromptu teaser to this from that build so...ye. Enjoy!


HISTORY

Conceived as a replacement for the subsonic Tu-16 'Badger', the Tupolev Tu-22 'Blinder' was the Soviet Union' first attempt to create a supersonic strategic bomber. The preliminary design for the aircraft dates back to the mid-late 1950's after the Tu-16 had been adopted into service. Though the Badger was a perfectly adequate bomber, it still lagged behind its western counterparts in key performance areas - namely range and speed. This was exacerbated further when the United States unveiled the Convair B-58A Hustler, a Mach 2 nuclear bomber that nearly jeopardized the Soviet air defense network. In response the Tupolev bureau drew up three competing designs; one was dropped, another was transformed into the Tupolev Tu-(1)28 'Fiddler' interceptor, and the last was accepted as the Tu-22 in mid 1954. Production of the new bomber began in 1962 and ran until the 1970's, producing only a few hundred aircraft throughout the aircraft's lifetime.

The Tu-22 is a long, sleek looking aircraft with a design configuration that, even on a small fighter, would have been quite bizzare. Its nose is sharply pointed and wings swept back at least 45 degrees or more for lower drag at high speeds. The twin turbojet engines, either VD-7M or RD-7M2, were mounted at the rear of the fuselage on either side of the vertical stabilizer. Originally a twin 23mm turret was placed in the rear, but this was deleted in later aircraft. Typical of Tupolev aircraft the main gear were placed in pods on the wings, which also helped the high speed flying characteristics; conversely the crew was unusually placed in a fighter-like tandem arrangement with the copilot sitting behind the pilot, and the bombardier placed in a bulge below the nose.

Though the Blinder was revolutionary in the USSR, many military officers were disappointed in the aircraft's performance; the design elements meant to facilitate Mach speed made landings and takeoffs fast and dangerous. The plane itself had too much drag to reach the same Mach 2 speed as the Hustler or the newly arrived 3rd generation fighters like the MiG-21. Its range was poor due to the high fuel consumption of the engines, making its marginally higher payload than the Badger somewhat less impressive. Later aircraft such as this Tu-22KD 'Blinder-B' were rebuilt into cruise missile carrier platforms, with a bulged nose to house the radar required to guide the weapon to its target. Refueling probes were also fitted to the Soviet Tu-22 fleet to extend their range. Blinders served in the Soviet Union, Libya, and Iraq throughout the later half of the Cold War, fighting in the aftermath of the Soviet-Afghan war, the Chadian-Libyan conflict, and the Iran-Iraq war until their retirement sometime after the fall of the USSR in 1991, and its lackluster performance led to the development of the Tu-22M 'Backfire' in the 1960's. This example is a Tu-22KD in typical Soviet bare metal finish, and armed with the Kh-22 (NATO name AS-4 'Kitchen') anti-ship cruise missile.

Source: fas(dot)net


Group1 - Brake chutes (which I guess don't actually exist on it or something but oh well)
Group2 - Engine start
Group8 - Arm 1x Kh-22
VTOLDown - Flaps
Trim - Pitch trim

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 78.8ft (24.0m)
  • Length 139.8ft (42.6m)
  • Height 32.5ft (9.9m)
  • Empty Weight 62,605lbs (28,397kg)
  • Loaded Weight 172,505lbs (78,247kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.328
  • Wing Loading 67.8lbs/ft2 (330.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 2,545.6ft2 (236.5m2)
  • Drag Points 1563

Parts

  • Number of Parts 271
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @EngineerOtaku can you please make the bomber version of this ?

    8 days ago
  • Profile image

    @MrTacito34 I have two already. Look through my gallery, friend.

    +1 8 days ago
  • Profile image
    6,648 DarkMarble1

    @EngineerOtaku Aye, Comrade we must make Boomer for air battle

    9 days ago
  • Profile image

    can u make a normal mig 21

    9 days ago
  • Profile image

    @ChiChiWerx Sheer dumb luck, probably. I thought it was too fast honestly, because I'd still be in the high 300-low 400kt range at 40% power while flying around 10k ft and lower

    9 days ago
  • Profile image
    27.5k ChiChiWerx

    @EngineerOtaku I saw that when I started tearing it apart! The horizontal stab flutters around a bit, not sure why as I assumed it was some sort of FT input. I was wrong. But how you got the speed is fast down low while not ludicrous up high eludes me.

    9 days ago
  • Profile image

    @ChiChiWerx No...not really. Stabilators just have Pitch+Trim but a range of +/- 5 degrees. That's not even funky trees except the first bit. Just XML tweaking.
    .
    Primary engines and the afterburners are just setup on activate 2. Big engines up front turn on from group 2 but have no power multiplier to simulate spool up (an idea I lifted from Asteroidbook's F-5E, so credit to them). No complex FT involved; just me actually trying to pay attention to more technical data than just size and weight dimensions. Getting good, to borrow internet kiddie language.
    .
    @DarkMarble1 Uhm...please don't do that lol but thanks; second Soviet bomber I've done and I ain't stopping here.

    9 days ago
  • Profile image
    27.5k ChiChiWerx

    On my favorites list...for the Funky Trees employed here. Pretty sure you have something on the engines as well as the horizontal stab. The low level speed is appropriate, while the speed at altitude is correct...impressive, takes FT to do that.

    9 days ago
  • Profile image
    6,648 DarkMarble1

    Me in my F-14 in the distance: INTENSE SNIFF Is that a RUSSIAN bomber I smell?!

    This looks really good.

    9 days ago
  • Profile image
    52.2k SimplyPlain

    @EngineerOtaku No, it's not -you use much less parts, and still manage to capture the plane's forms perfectly. Your version just has less nuts & bolts & trimmings, for which I'm sure all mobile users will thank you. An absolute thumbs up!!

    +1 9 days ago
  • Profile image
    32.6k Trainzo

    Great build . I love it . It's one of my favorite planes .

    +2 9 days ago
  • Profile image

    @SimplyPlain Pssh, your work is FAR better than the garbage I put out, but thanks.

    9 days ago
  • Profile image
    52.2k SimplyPlain

    My Blinder gets a mobile-friendly brother at last... cool!

    +2 9 days ago