Will Aircraft AI be improved to allow for squadron based air battles? i find it really annoying having to do a free for all battle and one v one battles just dont cut it anymore.
actually question: is there any maps from videogames that could be ported in to Simpleplanes thats somewhat large enough without being too costly on files?
@asteroidbook345 the V1 were more a flying bomb. the V2 i could agree to an extent but its more questionable than likely. not to mention the sources being recently put into question
we would like to place an order for 150 models with the following changes:
|
Larger engine
Retracting landing gear
4x Machine guns
2x hardpoints for 250lbs bombs or drop tanks.
|
optional:
Enclosed canopy
so.... designated light tank. but armour of a heavy.... i think this is actually an "Infantry Tank" that is the correct term for this.
other than that it is quite a capable design and it is nice to look at. but judging by said design. i cant really see how you would fit 5 people in this thing. 4 is pushing it but possible, but turret would be too cramped.
but enough rambling. its a good design but its specifications and classification is really letting it down. i would suggest downsizing the crew to 3-4 and relabel it as "Infantry Tank" it would make more sense for the design.
@shibusu i mean roads where the track of previous vehicles have sunken the road down. i think the best is: https://img.freepik.com/free-photo/impassable-dirt-off-road-deep-track_361360-2078.jpg
this image link may fail but it just shows a dirt roads with deep tracks
was about to say its not a yak 7 but when i looked around it turns out you were right. so not only is it an excellent build but i also learnt something new.
@Cennix ah. then i may have to nitpick a bit as the drivers position is blocking the part for the driveshaft. i would recommend putting the drivers position a bit to the side
@Titaninferna aye very detailed tho my first impressions were not so impressed. by first the exhaust looked like it was taken from the Mk V, then i wondered why the smaller oil cooler remained. then it was the "goshawk engine"
@Kaveman interesting. ill look at the next posts with great interest
@Kaveman i see. tho id probly advice you to put the canopy a bit forward and lengthen the hull to accommodate said engine
it looks cool. but if i can be a nitpicking annoyance. wheres the engine placement? since it doesnt seem to be enough space in the back
@WaltySimplePlanes69 or simpleworks
@AndrewGarrison dumb idea. simpletanks
one question i have for the Developers.
Will Aircraft AI be improved to allow for squadron based air battles? i find it really annoying having to do a free for all battle and one v one battles just dont cut it anymore.
+3@FlyingPatriot i see. anything similar?
actually question: is there any maps from videogames that could be ported in to Simpleplanes thats somewhat large enough without being too costly on files?
@FlyingPatriot i see. bit of a bummer
@FlyingPatriot i see. but arent almost all maps there days bigger than GTAV?
hmm would it be possible to see the Generation Zero map in simple planes?
+1@ST6454 no worries aslong as its helpful
+1slight correction. its an Jagdpanzer Elephant. but still a good build
+1@asteroidbook345 until proper sources can be found and confirmed. ill remain skepitcal
@asteroidbook345 the V1 were more a flying bomb. the V2 i could agree to an extent but its more questionable than likely. not to mention the sources being recently put into question
@asteroidbook345 experimental only. fired maybe a few times but never used
cool idea due to design. bad idea due to resources taken is alot more than strapping bombs on an older frame
+1@Numbers2 yeah people still put memorial posts so its unlikely anyone follows it
@Ummmhelli so am i yet i try to improve
we would like to place an order for 150 models with the following changes:
|
Larger engine
Retracting landing gear
4x Machine guns
2x hardpoints for 250lbs bombs or drop tanks.
|
optional:
Enclosed canopy
@Ummmhelli well doesnt stop ye from improving so give it a try. ye might be able to make something amazing
so.... designated light tank. but armour of a heavy.... i think this is actually an "Infantry Tank" that is the correct term for this.
other than that it is quite a capable design and it is nice to look at. but judging by said design. i cant really see how you would fit 5 people in this thing. 4 is pushing it but possible, but turret would be too cramped.
but enough rambling. its a good design but its specifications and classification is really letting it down. i would suggest downsizing the crew to 3-4 and relabel it as "Infantry Tank" it would make more sense for the design.
+2@MrGreen i see.
+1hmmm interesting
+2a very interesting design. but i must question the safety with the following question.
+1|
is this aerial vehicle "teo proof"
@shibusu noice
+1@shibusu i mean roads where the track of previous vehicles have sunken the road down. i think the best is: https://img.freepik.com/free-photo/impassable-dirt-off-road-deep-track_361360-2078.jpg
this image link may fail but it just shows a dirt roads with deep tracks
+1one test i really havent seen are sunken roads tests. honestly disappointed there isnt anything close to one so maybe try something similar
+1so its some water effects and a sonic boom. ok
was about to say its not a yak 7 but when i looked around it turns out you were right. so not only is it an excellent build but i also learnt something new.
so heres an upvote
@BoganBoganTheKid dude... uncalled for
anyway it doesnt really look in place as a ww2 tank. but it is an interesting design overall.
@RomanoMilos ah. also i think the road wheels are a bit too small. but thats my opinion
probly rude of me... but how is a japanese tank.... tagged as china?
how is the tank? any critics?
weaponized
+5how to fly it?
+9@HighMike its not meant to be flyable. just an attempt on canopy design
@Dkuz not sure whats sad about that but arigh
@Dkuz on a previous post i had said i would only make 1 plane with it and then never again. so its unlikely ill ever use cockpit parts
ok... so they have to be great war designs. but not great war as its pre ww2?
+1i wonder how this would be if given a DB603 instead
+3@Cennix ah. then i may have to nitpick a bit as the drivers position is blocking the part for the driveshaft. i would recommend putting the drivers position a bit to the side
its an interesting design. tho im a bit curious. the sprockets. are they at the front or the back?
so its a KV-1 with a pershing rear?
+1@CerberusWorks then i guess we have to find out aye?
+1interesting design and a nice attempt on a different powerplant. but now i wonder. how would it turn out if it was given an X-24 powerplant
+1is it bad i see it as a potential ww2 interceptor design?
+1yell to google. not us. not to mention consoles still dont have access to this game i would advice you to.... stop complaining
+3@Titaninferna aye very detailed tho my first impressions were not so impressed. by first the exhaust looked like it was taken from the Mk V, then i wondered why the smaller oil cooler remained. then it was the "goshawk engine"
so return of the superprops?
+3