@TheMouse basically it was a mess. Passed 5 years waiting for what turned out to be an unfinished, buggy early access that costed as much as the regular KSP without most of the features.
@Biological3DPrinter to attend all entries should be successors of the challenge (basically they should be based on the cockpit part of the challenge)
After that the build should respect the rule criteria that you can find on the challenge post's description.
If you want to enter this i suggest making the build a sub-assembly and use it on the cockpit part from the challenge.
@Nyamomin yes it does include side mirros since i'm using the site's measurements to count which builds count or not.
But if the width Is like 1.6/1.7m with side mirros i can make and exception.
uhhhhhh, sorry man but i just checked the size and i unfortunately have to disqualify this.
It's 2.4 meters wide so it doesn't fit the rules.
Still cool build, i hope you can modify this so it fits in the size limits.
@BYardley i managed to find some information about the size and it unfortunately doesn't count. It's a 4 meters long and 1.8 meters wide car so it's more of a B segment Subcompact than a Microcar.
That's a good point but to put it shortly. EV's are more energy efficient so even in this case they are cleaner.
Picture this: a hybrid is cleaner than a gas car, so why would an EV powered by a gas generator be worse while doing the same exact thing that the hybrid does?
P.S. also, is this really the best place to talk about a topic that has a lot of politically charged discourse? :I
All tags were requested
@DatFiat126Fan19
@TheMouse
Bro think he's on the team💀
+1"I am completely mentally stable"
+9....
...
"Oh hey look a civilian airliner!"
hold this
+2Great entry 👍
+1Hur hur
+1hurhur hur
hur hurhur, hurhur
hur hur, hurhur
hur hur, hurhur
@HuskyDynamics01 good point
@TheMouse basically it was a mess. Passed 5 years waiting for what turned out to be an unfinished, buggy early access that costed as much as the regular KSP without most of the features.
+1@Graingy i mean, i hope it doesn't end up like the KSP2 launch.
+1WE'RE GETTING THE ENTIRE SP COMMUNITY HYPED UP WITH THIS ONE🗣️🗣️🗣️💥💥💥‼️‼️‼️‼️
+1I always build with a lot of passion and try to keep high quality, so much so that this was crowned by the SP community as my best work.
+2H word? which H-word? Those are "Jonda Civic" and "Jonda NSX", no H required.
There's no H-word in ba sing se
+2@DatFiat126Guy19 well that sucks :(.
I hope it's not a big real and that you can post it anyways.
10/10 screenshot
+1@Biological3DPrinter to attend all entries should be successors of the challenge (basically they should be based on the cockpit part of the challenge)
After that the build should respect the rule criteria that you can find on the challenge post's description.
If you want to enter this i suggest making the build a sub-assembly and use it on the cockpit part from the challenge.
@Nyamomin yes it does include side mirros since i'm using the site's measurements to count which builds count or not.
+1But if the width Is like 1.6/1.7m with side mirros i can make and exception.
Damn, this could have been real good in my microcar challenge
+2...since i'm still waiting for this to be judged for a challenge :\ ...
@30 no problem bro 👍
@theNoobCountry2 this Is meant to be an entry for my Microcar challenge, i wasn't talking about the site's rules
That's cool, could you add a description with a bit of info about the car, so you can respect all of the rules.
+1🤨📸
@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 Oppenheimer stare.png
@Kerbango i think you could just shorten them up a bit and it should be fine, because otherwise this car is a really good little thing.
uhhhhhh, sorry man but i just checked the size and i unfortunately have to disqualify this.
It's 2.4 meters wide so it doesn't fit the rules.
Still cool build, i hope you can modify this so it fits in the size limits.
oh wow, this is cool
+1"Your remake is worse than Megamind 2🗣️🗣️ !!!! 🔥🔥🔥"
+3@DatTrainAndCarGuy19
Bro was so fast he upvoted before the build finished publishing 💀
+1ALL TAGS WERE REQUESTED
@DatTrainAndCarGuy19
@BYardley
@Mousewithamachinegun122
LIVE AIRLINERBUILDER REACTION
+1HEY!
+1Well that was fast💀
+1Step 1: go back to monky
Step 2: ??????
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit
sorry man but the car should have at least 20 parts to enter the challenge, so this is disqualified. You can try again, no worries.
+1@SBACERT yeah it seems to fit all of the rules. I'll test this out later
@BYardley i managed to find some information about the size and it unfortunately doesn't count. It's a 4 meters long and 1.8 meters wide car so it's more of a B segment Subcompact than a Microcar.
+1@SBACERT your build should have at least 20 parts to be accepted in the challenge. Any lower Is certain disqualification
@001 sure!
+1@SBACERT don't be afraid to take your time, you've got more than 2 months ahead of you to build so no worries.
Disqualified: Doesn't reach the minimum part limit
+1@BYardley Bro is about to cook 🗣️🔥🔥‼️‼️
+1@MrCOPTY not a microcar, it's larger than the size limit i put and it's classified as a citycar.
+1@SBACERT Sorry but i would prefer "full size" microcars in the challenge so RC's aren't allowed
@PapaKernels
Short answer: YES
+1Never!
@Mousewithamachinegun122 perhaps
@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 Car challenge'nt, a "micro" Car challenge'nt
@SkyGuyNoble Fastest updoot in the west
That's a good point but to put it shortly. EV's are more energy efficient so even in this case they are cleaner.
Picture this: a hybrid is cleaner than a gas car, so why would an EV powered by a gas generator be worse while doing the same exact thing that the hybrid does?
P.S. also, is this really the best place to talk about a topic that has a lot of politically charged discourse? :I
(mostly) because