ye, check the filament temperatures, width, and maybe what width your slicing software is set to.
(does the base/first layer break off of where it was printed while printing, or is it firmly secure on the moving plate thing?)
the term "near" is subjective, so thus, under my own understanding, I am relatively "near" to silver. In this case, despite this outcome probably being what you were intending anyways, take my upvote. Do not resist.
Why? Who started this war? Why is this war happening? What is it for? Who is the aggressor, and who is the defender? Is it clear? Is it blurred? Is there a simple reason, or a deeply rooted intricate explanation that didn’t become apparent until it was too late? Is this an isolated conflict on a small border or even a faraway empty battlefield? Or is it close to home? What do the civilians think of the war? Do they know why their county is fighting? Do they support the fighting? Is the reason for the war justified? Do the civilians think that that justification stands when they see their friends, parents, and children dying in a distant sky, field, or sea? Or worse, what do the civilians think when the war comes to them? Do they hoot and holler and cheer in bars and parlors when a victory is announced? Do they then grow silent and cold when the artillery fire is heard in the distance? What do they think of the war when the bombs start falling on their city? What do they think when there are tank battles and street-to-street fighting in the suburbs? What do they think when soldiers occupy the intersections downtown? What do they think when the high school is turned into a mass casualty hospital, and the elementary school a morgue? Did they ask for this war? Who started this war? Why?
Watch me accidentally blast past a hostile ship at 57 Km/s closing speed because I was on a reciprocal orbit and had my radar off because I was working a contact passively.
.
Also, question:
How do we detect, track, and target hostiles? There is no atmosphere in space, so in theory radar will reach almost infinitely farther, but at the same time so will optical sensors. Would we be able to have literally a souped up space telescope be a cheap alternative to a massive radar? Like a mechanical radar but with a telescope? IDK much about all this.
.
What are the engagement ranges? If we can detect a ship from thousands of kilometers away, can we launch a missile or kinetic kill vehicle and let it coast and maneuver as needed over a few hours?
@Boeing727200F
yuppers, that's the one
I had the anti sight on my M4A1 too lol, but it was the canted one. I usually just used an ACOG or EOTech as my main optic
Question:
Is this project for near-future mostly small realistic ships with "missiles," countermeasures, radar, decoys, retrograde engines, realistic orbital mechanics, and all that jazz, or more Star-Wars-ie like massive fleets with powerful ion-style engines, warp drives, laser bolts, anti-gravity, and such stuff?
In a meek defense of the B-52 (my beloved), and to an extent the TU-95 as well, these platforms have long range and extremely high endurance. This allows it to take off from Mississippi, fly across the word, and drop a few tomahawks (or, even better, stand-off stealth missiles) from several hundred miles away from the target while hiding in a cloud of jamming. Sure, they don’t stand a chance against modern air defenses or fighter aircraft, but they aren’t trying to merge with them either. They have their advantages and disadvantages. Warfare is all about countermeasures upon countermeasures.
Just my 2 cents. Idk
.
And now my main point: if you think the B-1 is sexy, check out the Hawker Siddeley Type 1011 concept
Ah, Mr. @Graingy. A snake issue, hm? Quite a departure from my area of expertise, but I shall attempt to meet your request nonetheless.
Might I recommend the Remington defensive model 870? It is a tried and true platform, versatile and adaptable, only limited by the one who wields it. This specific example is equipped with a RMR on a riser, for rapid target acquisition and reduced time to target.
(I have no idea what I’m talking about)
@CrestelAeronautics
I assure you that the concept is being developed and explored, albeit very slowly. Don’t expect anything too fancy, it will probably just be a static model, and might have a moving head that scans the sky and instrument panel if everything works out.
I believe one of the highest part count crafts is a late WWII-esque ship with 22,000 parts and only like 100,000 performance cost. 500,000 performance cost may only be possible with a NASA supercomputer
@AnotherRB
that is a very good point I did not consider before posting this, I'll clarify it in the description and hopefully not be yeeted by the moderators.
Thank you!
Florida taught me how to social engineer my way into places where I shouldn’t be and extensively damage the U.S. power grid when they were supposed to be teaching cyber security and then offered me free tuition at some college.
Pls only burn a little bit.
@BadahhMuscleCar001
I’m just using the word concord to refer to the relatively ambiguous green faction.
Concord basically means agreement and harmony or something, and it sorta refers to Concord’s competent command structure. Their air force isn’t hampered by bureaucracy or politics, and units are allowed to freely flow and develop innovative solutions to problems. Dissent is encouraged and the chain of command works to support the fighting forces in every way.
bro what is he doing in there?
+310-4
Kinda like Arkansas. They’re pretty cool, and it would be soooo much fun if they were real
+1ye, check the filament temperatures, width, and maybe what width your slicing software is set to.
(does the base/first layer break off of where it was printed while printing, or is it firmly secure on the moving plate thing?)
If that’s ERA armor I’m going to come to your house and steal your front door
five nights at L1nus's
+2Bronco?
If only summer vacation was an actual break...
+1What an interesting contraption
+2the term "near" is subjective, so thus, under my own understanding, I am relatively "near" to silver. In this case, despite this outcome probably being what you were intending anyways, take my upvote. Do not resist.
+2Why? Who started this war? Why is this war happening? What is it for? Who is the aggressor, and who is the defender? Is it clear? Is it blurred? Is there a simple reason, or a deeply rooted intricate explanation that didn’t become apparent until it was too late? Is this an isolated conflict on a small border or even a faraway empty battlefield? Or is it close to home? What do the civilians think of the war? Do they know why their county is fighting? Do they support the fighting? Is the reason for the war justified? Do the civilians think that that justification stands when they see their friends, parents, and children dying in a distant sky, field, or sea? Or worse, what do the civilians think when the war comes to them? Do they hoot and holler and cheer in bars and parlors when a victory is announced? Do they then grow silent and cold when the artillery fire is heard in the distance? What do they think of the war when the bombs start falling on their city? What do they think when there are tank battles and street-to-street fighting in the suburbs? What do they think when soldiers occupy the intersections downtown? What do they think when the high school is turned into a mass casualty hospital, and the elementary school a morgue? Did they ask for this war? Who started this war? Why?
+1Watch me accidentally blast past a hostile ship at 57 Km/s closing speed because I was on a reciprocal orbit and had my radar off because I was working a contact passively.
.
Also, question:
How do we detect, track, and target hostiles? There is no atmosphere in space, so in theory radar will reach almost infinitely farther, but at the same time so will optical sensors. Would we be able to have literally a souped up space telescope be a cheap alternative to a massive radar? Like a mechanical radar but with a telescope? IDK much about all this.
.
What are the engagement ranges? If we can detect a ship from thousands of kilometers away, can we launch a missile or kinetic kill vehicle and let it coast and maneuver as needed over a few hours?
I’m broke, can’t afford a real gun for a while. I plan on getting a .22 in a few years. Maybe I’ll slap the Anti sight on it. @Ashdenpaw1
@Boeing727200F
yuppers, that's the one
I had the anti sight on my M4A1 too lol, but it was the canted one. I usually just used an ACOG or EOTech as my main optic
10-4
Question:
Is this project for near-future mostly small realistic ships with "missiles," countermeasures, radar, decoys, retrograde engines, realistic orbital mechanics, and all that jazz, or more Star-Wars-ie like massive fleets with powerful ion-style engines, warp drives, laser bolts, anti-gravity, and such stuff?
In a meek defense of the B-52 (my beloved), and to an extent the TU-95 as well, these platforms have long range and extremely high endurance. This allows it to take off from Mississippi, fly across the word, and drop a few tomahawks (or, even better, stand-off stealth missiles) from several hundred miles away from the target while hiding in a cloud of jamming. Sure, they don’t stand a chance against modern air defenses or fighter aircraft, but they aren’t trying to merge with them either. They have their advantages and disadvantages. Warfare is all about countermeasures upon countermeasures.
+1Just my 2 cents. Idk
.
And now my main point: if you think the B-1 is sexy, check out the Hawker Siddeley Type 1011 concept
perhaps, but I can't sell you a stick
Ah, Mr. @Graingy. A snake issue, hm? Quite a departure from my area of expertise, but I shall attempt to meet your request nonetheless.
Might I recommend the Remington defensive model 870? It is a tried and true platform, versatile and adaptable, only limited by the one who wields it. This specific example is equipped with a RMR on a riser, for rapid target acquisition and reduced time to target.
(I have no idea what I’m talking about)
like Lowes or something, idk
maybe amazon
a very big vacuum cleaner
What on earth is that
@CrestelAeronautics
I assure you that the concept is being developed and explored, albeit very slowly. Don’t expect anything too fancy, it will probably just be a static model, and might have a moving head that scans the sky and instrument panel if everything works out.
@CrestelAeronautics
I’m a perfectionist and I can’t figure out how to model realistic ears
Happiness is not a destination, it’s a direction.
+1highest performance cost I could find with a quick search
I believe one of the highest part count crafts is a late WWII-esque ship with 22,000 parts and only like 100,000 performance cost. 500,000 performance cost may only be possible with a NASA supercomputer
What on earth?
Dude just made 193 comments, i ain’t upvoting all of those
+3That stupid orange. I hate that thing lol. I rejoice over your victory.
+1He is a coward and history will forget him.
+1even this isn't enough
WE NEED MORE
:(
@AnotherRB
that is a very good point I did not consider before posting this, I'll clarify it in the description and hopefully not be yeeted by the moderators.
Thank you!
Florida taught me how to social engineer my way into places where I shouldn’t be and extensively damage the U.S. power grid when they were supposed to be teaching cyber security and then offered me free tuition at some college.
+2Pls only burn a little bit.
My flight instructor lets me drink the AvGas when we check the sumps on the wings, it’s free and tasty
+1Give Monarchii and WarningStar lemons next
Not really @DatFiat126Guy19.
+2It is beautiful though
ok.
+1evil laughter
It was me! It’s all part of my master plan to destroy my arch-nemesis!
disappears into a cloud of evil smoke
Very fair points, I may attempt this in the future
+3Police! Search warrant! Open the door! Anybody in there!?
+4Yeah, sorry, I just check my notes, you’re not allowed to do that.
+1My gosh, what have you done
+1@ConvoyPerson
+2Could I modify this?
@BadahhMuscleCar001
+1Perhaps, maybe in a few weeks. I'll put it in my notes.
Thanks, will do! @TalonTheCRTguy
+1Thanks friend! @Cerdd
+1Could you elaborate on the nozzle? What can I improve?
Would you be cool with me modifying this?
+1@BadahhMuscleCar001
+1I’m just using the word concord to refer to the relatively ambiguous green faction.
Concord basically means agreement and harmony or something, and it sorta refers to Concord’s competent command structure. Their air force isn’t hampered by bureaucracy or politics, and units are allowed to freely flow and develop innovative solutions to problems. Dissent is encouraged and the chain of command works to support the fighting forces in every way.