@OkaNieba Well... I don't want to sound greedy or something, but I don't really allow successors on my modified builds but maybe you should use the original build instead...
@Shikikanlunaoffinalglory
Oh Hey there! I just saw around here, at it seems that you create ships here in SP and their somewhat mobile friendly to say...
Good build! tho I don't think it's quite mobile friendly as the performance cost is saying otherwise, but still it could use some performance improvements.
It a pretty good one...
tho I also have some things to say and its entirely up to you how you will react...
For starters, Acceleration is too quick for a cargo jet
try lowering the smooth(throttle, 0.25), to somewhere 0.01 or lower, I know its absurdly low but I did my tests too, and it did quite some realistic acceleration
on the 300 kph takeoff part, I don't think cargo planes can at least takeoff at those
speed or I might be wrong to say the least, but if you think it is too low...
Add the XML "liftScale" on the wing category, on the main wings
This controls the lift it will generate, higher will generate more lift and lower will generate less lift
These are just some suggestions if you want to make it a little more realistic but its mostly up to you
And somehow dependant radar aiming works pretty well... the only downside is that automatic and semi-automatic aiming is not possible due to technical issues,
(All FT code is not mine, I just striped them out of different planes I've downloaded for quite a long time ago, but I will credit the coder once released)
so manual guidance is only available on missile SPAA.
I also used a third party crosshair app for easier aiming
I modified it to have mobility and Self-Propelled Guidance when AG1 and AG2 is activated.
It still have Semi-Automatic Guidance when either AG1 or AG2 is activated, but it also now allows Manual Guidance for more control...
Self-Propelled Guidance still need tweaking...
I tweaked some things here and there on this build, more specifically it has semi-automatic tracking...
Something similar to War Thunder SPAAs
its still not quite perfect to say... but I will make improvements
@ReinMcDeer That's good to know! I've been using the database for quite a while now to at least make missiles performance accurately for my modified aircrafts for M.B.S.
It was honestly a blessing to just somehow find it
@SoYouDontHaveTo I searched it up, this seems to be used by NASA and US Airforce, but I could not find any data of any combat history, it was said primarily used for research and testing purposes...
So sadly it doesn't reach the requirements to be accepted. It must be a military aircraft primarily used for combat or ground attack.
B I G Happy Inlet
Awesome build!
I'm cooking with v1.2 rn, so I'm quite packed with modifying
Anyways, It's an Awesome Take!😎
+2And Is that @TheMouse...? Then I take Second
Great Build!
I actually didn't know this actually existed in real life... well technically according to Wikipedia its planned for 2027...
But, overall very impressive!😎
+2Oh what? In the same day too? I also just released my F-14 too
But anyways this is a 😎 build and alot Mobile friendly compared to mine
+2Great one!👍
@Wolfy26 Oops my bad, I'll change it immediately, thanks for the lookout
+1@OkaNieba Well... I don't want to sound greedy or something, but I don't really allow successors on my modified builds but maybe you should use the original build instead...
+1@Omoriboy It had to be, the original was laggy enough, but introduced a lot of wing flex
+1@IQinventory
+1Great Build! You dropped the 30 yesterday, now the 34!
@IQinventory Thanks! F-5E is close to be released, I'm just checking for errors...
I've also released a test footage of SPAAs Mechanics for the future
+1@IQinventory Thanks! Apologies for the delays on other aircrafts
+1But I'm back on track on posting the other ones!
M.B.S. v1.1
@IQinventory Thanks!
+1@Shikikanlunaoffinalglory
Oh Hey there! I just saw around here, at it seems that you create ships here in SP and their somewhat mobile friendly to say...
But honestly Very Impressive!
+1Keep it Up!😎👍
Jundroo Simple Flight Simulator
Also very well made and impressive!👍
+1@XNorthern
Hmmm... Naval Battles...?
Hey There! While I mostly build planes once in a while... this is an impressive build!
I don't have much knowledge about naval battles in general...
But anyways, Great Build!👍
+1Cool Build and very mobile friendly!
Hmmm... now this got me thinking about adding the F/A-18 to M.B.S.
But anyways this is a solid one!
+1Great👍
@ACEOFFICERS your request has been made
+1A W A C S
Good build! tho I don't think it's quite mobile friendly as the performance cost is saying otherwise, but still it could use some performance improvements.
Anyways its still a good build!👍
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph Thanks! You can check more modified aircrafts of M.B.S thru the my profile
+1@ACEOFFICERS I did research on this variant, I'll put this on the list with the "under review" status,
Thanks for the request, stay updated on the M.B.S list
+1It a pretty good one...
tho I also have some things to say and its entirely up to you how you will react...
For starters, Acceleration is too quick for a cargo jet
try lowering the smooth(throttle, 0.25), to somewhere 0.01 or lower, I know its absurdly low but I did my tests too, and it did quite some realistic acceleration
on the 300 kph takeoff part, I don't think cargo planes can at least takeoff at those
speed or I might be wrong to say the least, but if you think it is too low...
Add the XML "liftScale" on the wing category, on the main wings
This controls the lift it will generate, higher will generate more lift and lower will generate less lift
These are just some suggestions if you want to make it a little more realistic but its mostly up to you
Anyways, Great Plane!👍
+1@localf15enjoyer just 2 more buddy, stay tuned
@PrussianAirlines the bomb is to actually serve as the ammo rack, but other SPAAs do not have it
@localf15enjoyer lol, I just opened the website with like 10 notifications on me, but thanks...
v1.2 is close by
3rd Time's a charm!
We're back with SPAAs for Test 3, using the LAV-AD I've modified made by @Scorch
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/OpGgU1/LAV-AD
And somehow dependant radar aiming works pretty well... the only downside is that automatic and semi-automatic aiming is not possible due to technical issues,
(All FT code is not mine, I just striped them out of different planes I've downloaded for quite a long time ago, but I will credit the coder once released)
so manual guidance is only available on missile SPAA.
I also used a third party crosshair app for easier aiming
@Aifleron I simply put a blasto BFE300 inside one of each engine, Its quite noisy tho
After Part 2 of v1.1 is released...
I've been doing additional mechanics to SPAAs
The video uses the M163 made by @maxres
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/UQY8C1/M163-VADS-AI
I modified it to have mobility and Self-Propelled Guidance when AG1 and AG2 is activated.
It still have Semi-Automatic Guidance when either AG1 or AG2 is activated, but it also now allows Manual Guidance for more control...
Self-Propelled Guidance still need tweaking...
@Dister12 Well.. It seems you hopped quite into the future...
It's now on the list, but there will be a right time to release it.
I am currently focusing on 4th gen fighters at the moment, but thanks for suggesting!
@Aifleron The Mirage III is now on the list under the pending status
@LarryTad
Thanks! I'm still working on it...
You can also check the my profile for more info and aircrafts I've modified
M.B.S. v1.1
While I wait for the aircraft posting cooldown to dissipate, I have been doing prototype things for SPAAs...
The video above is a M163 made by maxres
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/UQY8C1/M163-VADS-AI
I tweaked some things here and there on this build, more specifically it has semi-automatic tracking...
Something similar to War Thunder SPAAs
its still not quite perfect to say... but I will make improvements
P.S.
I actually don't know how to post videos here on the forums...
So links will do for now, Apologies
@ReinMcDeer That's good to know! I've been using the database for quite a while now to at least make missiles performance accurately for my modified aircrafts for M.B.S.
It was honestly a blessing to just somehow find it
But anyways, I will be waiting!😎👍
@SoYouDontHaveTo Its ok, you may request another one but it should follow the rules above
I'll be waiting!😎
@localf15enjoyer
Hey there! Thanks for the suggestions!
The MiG-25 is now accepted!
As for the A-6 Intruder is pending as of the moment...
But thanks for suggesting!
Check more of M.B.S. thru here
@ACEOFFICERS Your welcome, be sure to check more of M.B.S. while your around here
Have a nice day!👍
@localf15enjoyer Sure, but as of the moment I'm currently working on the F-5
But I will definitely add this to M.B.S.
Also there a post a made specifically for aircraft requests
Check it here
@CrestelAeronautics well... I can say it is quite accurate
tho the empty weight of the F-111 is 21000kg
but this is entirely up to you if you want to change it
Vark!
Hey there! This is build is quite cool, especially the ejection pod
Keep it Up!👍
Very well made! but about the part of mobile friendly depends on device power that can handle the performance cost of 1900
But overall it is a very well made craft
Great Build👍
@AnotherRB Great Job! Now you can utilise it to its full advantage
@AnotherRB Hey, you quite seem in need of help
Visit this...
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/198926/Markdown-Formatting-test-explanations
I hope it answers your questions👍
@SoYouDontHaveTo I searched it up, this seems to be used by NASA and US Airforce, but I could not find any data of any combat history, it was said primarily used for research and testing purposes...
So sadly it doesn't reach the requirements to be accepted. It must be a military aircraft primarily used for combat or ground attack.
I'm Sorry
@ACEOFFICERS
@ReinMcDeer Hey is it ok if I ask a question here about the "Weapon Balancing Database"?
Will you add AIM-54s to the database someday?
Honestly pretty good, tho the SU-27 has only three pylons on the wings but overall really good, and mobile friendly 👍