@Killjoy876 you don’t have to do that, you can contain the part inside your cannon body made of fuselage blocks, and slightly decrease the scale of the guns to achieve the effect
@Okay67M8 dismantle the crane from its base to put the aircraft above but not attached to the catapult, turn off AG8 and activate AG5, increase throttle to 100% and press V to launch the aircraft after around 7 seconds. There may be some bug during the first and second launches, just restart. Don't launch the aircraft above 20 kts, and I do admit that picking the seaplane up is extremely hard.
@Okay67M8 dismantle the crane from its base to put the aircraft above but not attached to the catapult, turn off AG8 and activate AG5, increase throttle to 100% and press V to launch the aircraft after around 7 seconds. There may be some bug during the first and second launches, just restart. Don't launch the aircraft above 20 kts, and I do admit that picking the seaplane up is extremely hard.
@Lazer22 LoL I've used some strange techniques for the drag, and its rather suprising that this build can run on someone's mobile... Thanks for appreciating it.
@jelybaca Please try input: Brake*(1-LandingGear) for the spoilers, and in fact the nose needs only two panels at the “cheek” area. BTW, you still built the best DC-8 I see in here.
@jelybaca I think I need to clarify I'm totally not nitpicking, and I fully recognize your technique and effort through your previous builds. This is only a suggestion and answering with a "do it yourself" attitude may seem somewhat inappropriate.
impressive, but there's a issue with the avionic logic: DC8s have no hydraulics supplied to all airbrakes, and thus they cannot use spoiler in the most times of their flights, they rely on reversers. DC8-70s may use reversers of their 2&3 engines in MaxContinuousThrust inflight in accordance to the manual.
and it would be great if there's less seams in Section 41.
@Japanesenavy234 good idea, but the Asama is fundamentally Amagi with better sigma, and Wargaming is reluctant to even release some more shots of the ship
I think the front section of the aircraft is pretty good, so do the wings. The rear part of the aircraft is somewhat confusing and shows no hint of whether the empennage is “going up” or down in relationship to the general axis. Reshaping that section would be helpful@Ptiju23
@asteroidbook345 yes, but it would be relieved if the issue is officially solved. I have a battleship with 5 turrets that would take years to accommodate the sequenc
@soldier289 what about IJN tosa modernized version?
+1Coming soooooon in sequence: Akagi, Fuso, Yamashiro, Ise class in battleship state and hybrid state
+1Extraordinary build!
+1@sheepsblood games are different from reality, you know
+1@Killjoy876 you don’t have to do that, you can contain the part inside your cannon body made of fuselage blocks, and slightly decrease the scale of the guns to achieve the effect
+1awesome build!
@KrittanonTH yep
O M O S H I R O I
Awesome, I just wish tat she is fatter lol
@Okay67M8 dismantle the crane from its base to put the aircraft above but not attached to the catapult, turn off AG8 and activate AG5, increase throttle to 100% and press V to launch the aircraft after around 7 seconds. There may be some bug during the first and second launches, just restart. Don't launch the aircraft above 20 kts, and I do admit that picking the seaplane up is extremely hard.
@Okay67M8 dismantle the crane from its base to put the aircraft above but not attached to the catapult, turn off AG8 and activate AG5, increase throttle to 100% and press V to launch the aircraft after around 7 seconds. There may be some bug during the first and second launches, just restart. Don't launch the aircraft above 20 kts, and I do admit that picking the seaplane up is extremely hard.
@CrushburnHQ lol
@OrangeConnor those AA kills... each of them has 40+parts
@13321892812 lol
@Oakland thx
@Frenchguyn666 yep
@Frenchguyn666 Pagoda masts and those uncovered AA takes way much parts to build...
@MAHADI lol
@BubbleLukasie Herbe
@typeZERO that is actually better, you know at least this is not magic lol
@soldier289 thanks
@BubbleLukasie I mean you
@TanksWorldwide same actually
@Tang0five thanks
@typeZERO NO SMOLENSK Bro
@CodenameMorgan thanks
@NavalBlaze thx
@Lazer22 LoL I've used some strange techniques for the drag, and its rather suprising that this build can run on someone's mobile... Thanks for appreciating it.
@BubbleLukasie whos this???
@Mekomara yeah, just go ahead
@BubbleLukasie ha
@FinnLZYyumi thx
@Yte1234567 thx
@NAD thanks!
@jelybaca Please try input: Brake*(1-LandingGear) for the spoilers, and in fact the nose needs only two panels at the “cheek” area. BTW, you still built the best DC-8 I see in here.
@jelybaca I think I need to clarify I'm totally not nitpicking, and I fully recognize your technique and effort through your previous builds. This is only a suggestion and answering with a "do it yourself" attitude may seem somewhat inappropriate.
impressive, but there's a issue with the avionic logic: DC8s have no hydraulics supplied to all airbrakes, and thus they cannot use spoiler in the most times of their flights, they rely on reversers. DC8-70s may use reversers of their 2&3 engines in MaxContinuousThrust inflight in accordance to the manual.
and it would be great if there's less seams in Section 41.
@klm747klm747 yep
Very nice build, but 707 has a "fatter" Section 41 lower lobe comparing to that of 727 and 737.
@Japanesenavy234 good idea, but the Asama is fundamentally Amagi with better sigma, and Wargaming is reluctant to even release some more shots of the ship
bugs fixed update
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/WF6xjx/H8K2
I think the front section of the aircraft is pretty good, so do the wings. The rear part of the aircraft is somewhat confusing and shows no hint of whether the empennage is “going up” or down in relationship to the general axis. Reshaping that section would be helpful@Ptiju23
@EternalDarkness you know things become a mess when you have a lot of guns on the project
@EternalDarkness great that the option has been suggested, thanks
@Armyguy1534 but this is not a complaint
@Armyguy1534 lol
@asteroidbook345 yes, but it would be relieved if the issue is officially solved. I have a battleship with 5 turrets that would take years to accommodate the sequenc
AG7 to operate engines, gear to retract floats
@jamesPLANESii bad news...
@jamesPLANESii yes it is like that