Profile image

Starline Industries: GB-7K Gryphon

28.6k ALTMTR  2.0 years ago
Auto Credit Based on BeastHunter's Starline Industries Gryphon

This successor delivers few more digits to the original top speed and more jamming capabilities, but sacrifices much of maneuverability. None like the former nation that provides its weapon, it is now loaded with more so sophisticated weaponry. Extended firing range, decreased firing delay, and increased damage.

Controls
Basic SP Controls Flight Controls
Ag1 Canopy
Ag2 Flaps
Ag3 Nav Lights
Ag4 --
Ag5 --
Ag6 --
Ag7 --
Ag8 --

Arsenal
4x Casper Multirole Missile
2x Haus AA

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Starline Industries Gryphon
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 27.4ft (8.4m)
  • Length 30.0ft (9.1m)
  • Height 10.8ft (3.3m)
  • Empty Weight 5,101lbs (2,313kg)
  • Loaded Weight 13,963lbs (6,333kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 3.822
  • Wing Loading 44.7lbs/ft2 (218.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 312.7ft2 (29.0m2)
  • Drag Points 4216

Parts

  • Number of Parts 194
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,382
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    Nice ✌️✌🏽✌🏻✌🏼✌🏾✌🏿✌️

    +3 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    28.6k ALTMTR

    If curious,

    G(Garuda: Class type)
    B(Battalion: One of Many)
    7 (Build number)
    K (Interception + High speed: Mission Type)

    +2 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    28.6k ALTMTR

    @ZeroWithSlashedO The name would've stuck as is. @BeastHunter didn't put a designation number so I took the liberty to do so. Assuming it was named as "GB-6", "GB-7K" would make it a successor but the naming is still the same as the base was from the "GB-6".

    +2 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    28.6k ALTMTR

    @ZeroWithSlashedO fixed and don't forget the jamming I put on it.

    +2 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.1k BeastHunter

    @ZeroWithSlashedO It’s a remake and a variant. Call it whatever you want to call it.

    +3 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.1k BeastHunter

    @ALTMTR @ZeroWithSlashedO I’m just going to link it and I don’t care what happens.

    +3 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @ALTMTR
    Still, I see it as a successor more than anything else.
    Let me list why.

    • Wing looks different. Quite different.
    • LERX is added, which the original doesn't.
    • Wingtip "pylon" is removed.
    • It's longer.
    • Intake is now stored below the wing instead of being in the side of the wing.

    You know how the F/A-18E/F is a redesign of the F/A-18C/D? Yeah, that's what this feels like.

    +3 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    28.6k ALTMTR

    @ZeroWithSlashedO Variants could look entirely different

    +1 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.1k BeastHunter

    @ZeroWithSlashedO Okay. I’ll fix that.

    +1 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @BeastHunter
    I, uh... Don't think this is even a variant anymore. I feel like this is a successor more than a variant.

    +3 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.1k BeastHunter

    I have linked this as a variant on the original post. I hope you’re fine with that!

    +2 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.1k BeastHunter

    @ZeroWithSlashedO You may find this one better. It has slats and more advanced weaponry.

    +2 2.0 years ago