Profile image

T28/T95 (GMC)-Super Heavy Tank

17.0k pixelconcqueror  6.6 years ago
3,326 downloads

History: The T28 was an expiremental heavy tank destroyer constructed to pass the Siegfried line during late WW2, this vehicle was not mass produced due to cost, time of war and reliability... Specifications:This vehicle holstered a 105mm gun and would have had the choice of a 155mm gun later,but never happened; the 155 would have officially made the vehicle a T95. It weighed 95 tons and went a maximum speed of 8km/h. 355mm of frontal armor made this tank extremely dense and capable of blocking large german rounds. This vehicle has 2 exterior seperate tracksystems that are removable and transportable by cranes that are on the tank. Conclusion: Near the end of the war multiple models were ordered but only 2 were produced, sadly only one was recovered and found rusting in a field secluded from society. Today the last T28 stays heavy, beautiful, lumbering and a wonder at fort Knox tank museum... Creators words: After a month of building and replicating, its finally finished. I recommend you download this vehicle with cuation and please comment and upvote. would love to hear feedback.(press 1 for surprise)

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +7 bonus
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 22.9ft (7.0m)
  • Length 55.0ft (16.8m)
  • Height 15.1ft (4.6m)
  • Empty Weight 35,289lbs (16,006kg)
  • Loaded Weight 49,930lbs (22,648kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 22574

Parts

  • Number of Parts 972
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 5,041
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    Turtle 🐢🐢🐢🐢

    1.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    495 Sturm

    @pixelconcqueror -._-.

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Sturm ;)

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    495 Sturm

    you are alive?

    +1 3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @hRmm lol, maybe

    4.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    678 hRmm

    Can this beat the Russian Bias?

    +1 4.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @og31S you mean the doom turtle

    +1 5.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    628 og31S

    You mean the Turtle?

    +1 5.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,289 GreatHenry

    My fav tank in WoT Blitz.

    +1 5.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    I love it! Except for one problem: The gun doesn’t work. Other than that, YES!!! Excellent work!

    +2 5.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @pixelconcqueror ofcourse it is!

    +1 5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @1TheSleepySheep1 haha awesome right?

    5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    dont you hate it when you sepporate the outer tracks and you drive your ~95ton tank at 200+mph?

    love it actually

    +1 5.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    pixelconqueror the hull is from t95 and the gun idk

    +1 6.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Svenplayzz The name states that the 105 mm gun is what made the tank the the T28 but the 150 mm gun is what made it the t95, plus the weight of the tank. This model is based directly off the one in fort knox.

    6.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    this is the t95 not t28 ;)

    +1 6.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @FltLtFox indeed.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    384 FltLtFox

    DOOM TURTLE

    +1 6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.9k Rodrigo110

    Thanks @pixelconcqueror

    +1 6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Rodrigo110 and now you have a new follower.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.9k Rodrigo110

    All good, you definitely deserve it @pixelconcqueror

    +1 6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Rodrigo110 thanks man, love the suppourt.

    6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.9k Rodrigo110

    It’s ok though, I don’t really mind whether it fires or not; great job on this build! @pixelconcqueror

    +1 6.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.9k Rodrigo110

    It would only add 4 or 5 more parts @pixelconcqueror

    +1 6.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Rodrigo110 I dont meen in relative size, i was reffering to the part count.

    6.6 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments