15.5k Wernster Comments

  • P.A. 38 3.6 years ago

    @airlinerbuilder l'll Be Waiting. ^^

    +1
  • COMAC C919 interior 3.6 years ago

    This Is Worked Hard On For Sure, I Wish I Had This Kind Of Determination. :3

    +1
  • P.A. 33 3.6 years ago

    This Is Really Awesome Friend! It Definitely Is a Masterpiece In My Eyes!

    +1
  • BJ 2 ( private jet challenge) 3.6 years ago

    Helpful Custom Landing Gear Tips Based On My Experience Yay!:

    Higher Damper = Tougher Landing Gear,

    Too High Damper = Bouncy Landings, (Ouch)

    Solid Landing Gear = Fragile, But Not Really Sure How It Works... (Light Airplanes Do Not Suffer Though)

    Too High Spring Strength= Fragile
    Too Low Spring Strength = Wheels Sink And The Landing Gear Would Get Damaged

    Find The Perfect Balance! For Me I Pair Mid-Low Spring Strength 10-100 (Depending On The Weight) With High Damper, Around 150. I Hope This Helps! UwU

    +1
  • [CLOSED] Airliner Challenge 3.6 years ago

    This Seems Fun! I'll Participate! After All This Might Greatly Help Me Become Well Known, I'll Get Devillan.co To Work On This!

    Also Good Luck To Everyone Participating In This Challenge!

    +1
  • Challenge Entry - Conquest C600 3.6 years ago

    Good Luck!

    +1
  • Private/business jet challenge 3.6 years ago

    I'm In! Hopefully This Would Help Me Become Well Known, I'll Get Devillan.co To Work On This Immediately!

    +1
  • P.A. 28 3.6 years ago

    This Is Definitely An Awesome Build! Looking Forward To Your Other Future Builds!

    +1
  • AJL Grasshopper 4x4 1.3 3.6 years ago

    Amazing Build Once Again!

    I Wish We Could Be Rivals!

    +1
  • MT-1 MK.IIH Fury Howitzer support 3.6 years ago

    The SPG Itself Seems Built By a Beginner But I Can Still Sense The Effort! Bravo!

    I Hope You Improve Into a Respectable Designer One Day!
    (Also I Love Your Aeroplane Designs, Keep Up The Good Work!)

    +1
  • Tank/vehicle damage model explanation 1.2 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman I tried them before but sadly it doesn't work as good ^w^;

  • 15cm field howitzer (Yeager) 2.9 years ago

    @Thegrandwosh Thank you!

  • Vortex TM-1935 G 2.9 years ago

    Quite impressive! But maybe a lil' overkill considering the fact that the majority of tanks it would face would be Pz.IIs and Vickers MkE variants, the design itself seems to belong in 1943-1945, please don't be afraid to raise the date higher as this would also contribute to realism too!

  • Meskers G9 >:3 2.9 years ago

    @pablosuso92 No pressure, haha.

  • 15cm field howitzer (Yeager) 2.9 years ago

    @rexzion Sure!

  • Meskers G9 >:3 2.9 years ago

    @MajorSix Sorry, I'll only post my world war two designs, I'll keep all the modern stuff to myself.

  • Teaser :3 2.9 years ago

    @Iloveplaneslol Thank you.

  • Tank/vehicle damage model explanation 2.9 years ago

    @Jaspy109 For planes it would be better to re-enable drag calculation and to set the major fuselages to maybe around 50-150 with lower HP around the cockpit but higher on the front or on non important/empty areas. :3

  • GHA-1998 2.9 years ago

    @MrGreen Sure! Absolutely.

  • GHA-1998 2.9 years ago

    @Cereal ;3

  • GHA.102 2.9 years ago

    @PapaKernels Hey! You're supposed to colour it yourself, the reason why it lacks colour is to encourage customization to anyone that downloads it.
    Kinda like a blank canvas. :3

  • GHA-1998 2.9 years ago

    @PapaKernels Sadly I forgot to add it, no worries though, the next trucks would definitely include one.

  • Lis-02 mod.A 2.9 years ago

    @MooseMan8223 It's not really in scale hence the size haha, but I got used to it rather quickly.

  • GHA-1998 2.9 years ago

    @JustNormalPerson Haha, yes absolutely!

  • GHA-1998 2.9 years ago

    @PioThePioneer Aw, thank you so much! I might remake the guide too, since it is getting a lil' outdated.

  • Naval.artillery-1 (Wright) 2.9 years ago

    @LittleJerry Only heavy cruisers would be added, battleships are too large.

  • WellsHT (Plat.T033) 2.9 years ago

    @TirpitzWantsPlanes I might build it, but at the same time I may also not build it, since just like the tiger it also has many roadwheels, and roadwheels make up like, 35% of the total part count.

  • WellsHT (Plat.T033) 2.9 years ago

    @MajorSix A grading system would be useful but I guess it would be better if there weren't any. Also um, a month might take too long, how about 4-5weeks?

  • WellsHT (Plat.T033) 2.9 years ago

    @MajorSix Absolutely sir, that sounds fun! No part count limit right?

  • WellsHT (Plat.T033) 2.9 years ago

    @Iloveplaneslol Nope, too many roadwheels and complex turret would make the part count a little too high.

  • Lo-I (Plat.T033) 2.9 years ago

    @JustNormalPerson Thank you. :3

  • New addition to tier2! + Bonus clip. 2.9 years ago

    @KytoNightGuard Sure, I would love to see how it would look with tracks.

  • New addition to tier2! + Bonus clip. 2.9 years ago

    @Jaspy109 Maybe you got something wrong, double check it.

  • New addition to tier2! + Bonus clip. 2.9 years ago

    @Jaspy109 There's an option to add a camera in the cannon's settings, for firing in salvos set all the cannon's rate of fire to 0 except for the main one, set the actual reload speed there, I hope this helps. :3

  • New addition to tier2! + Bonus clip. 2.9 years ago

    @210100 That's actually quite a good idea, i'll add it to my inspiration list. :3

  • New addition to tier2! + Bonus clip. 2.9 years ago

    @Iloveplaneslol Yes! I actually plan on it ever since I finished the first naval artillery vessel.

  • Old armoured car (model J) 2.9 years ago

    @MooseMan8223 Thank you! :3

  • Steam Frigate "Samara" 2.9 years ago

    Absolutely amazing! Keep up the good work.

  • Gunboat-1 (Wright) 2.9 years ago

    @MooseMan8223 Thank you! and yes I do indeed plan on making a stationary AA.

  • Naval.artillery-1 (Wright) 2.9 years ago

    @PapaKernels Absolutely! This one is nowhere near something like a heavy cruiser.

  • Gunboat-1 (Wright) 2.9 years ago

    @Hawchac123 I'm sorry I'm always pretty busy, but if you want to I could give it a damage model once you're done. ;3

  • Cromwell 2.9 years ago

    @Jaspy109 Yes sir, absolutely, the Churchill is one of my favorite tanks, only problem is the roadwheels will eat the part count, but shouldn't really be that much of a problem. :3

  • Naval.artillery-2 (Yeager) 2.9 years ago

    @Bf109g6 If you want to make it sink reduce the buoyancy of the front and rear flotation fuselages within the boat!
    (Use X-ray to see it) :3

  • Gunboat-1 (Wright) 2.9 years ago

    @Hawchac123 Yup! It has, and it is absolutely compatible with ground vehicles.

  • Naval.artillery-1 (Wright) 2.9 years ago

    @Bf109g6 Thank you. :3

  • T-803 Wagon 2.9 years ago

    @Lerkov1991 I'm not really sure, I remember making something similar awhile back, but still not so sure.

  • Thank you. 2.9 years ago

    @pablosuso92 Wow, I didn't expect that you drew tanks too.

  • Thank you. 2.9 years ago

    @Ruskiwaffle1991 Thank you!

  • Low part count. ;3 2.9 years ago

    @Ruskiwaffle1991 Actually the vessels in the video are already 5months old at this point, hehe.

  • Low part count. ;3 2.9 years ago

    @Bf109g6 Yup, it could, although with lower explosion scalar only, and with tremendous knockback.