Profile image

Sukhoi PAK-FA SU-57

48.1k FinnReignSUPREME  5 months ago

Coming Next V2.0

This one is shit

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s)
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 42.2ft (12.9m)
  • Length 62.2ft (19.0m)
  • Height 12.9ft (3.9m)
  • Empty Weight 44,823lbs (20,331kg)
  • Loaded Weight 64,706lbs (29,350kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.458
  • Wing Loading 7.1lbs/ft2 (34.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 9,137.7ft2 (848.9m2)
  • Drag Points 9954

Parts

  • Number of Parts 728
  • Control Surfaces 2
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    7,523 Ultra0

    Really good

    Pinned 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    大佬

    3 months ago
  • Profile image
    330 drfsdev

    Super cool.

    4 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,144 ZWLenning

    JESUS CHRIST THE CODE FOR THE SPEEDOMETER
    btw how the hell did you figure that out?

    4 months ago
  • Profile image
    120 ooooop

    NB

    4 months ago
  • Profile image

    It looks good, but it doesn't perform good (also you got any source for the cartoon images of the F-22 and SU-57 ?)

    +3 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    Ots got a working speedometer, im sold.

    +2 5 months ago
  • Profile image
    3,360 chibikitsune

    P L A N E. I S. P L A N E.

    long story short
    its a plane
    It looks nice.
    If you dont like the handling redo it yourself
    give the man some credit, he made a nice aircraft.

    +12 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    I accept your criticism; it's to the point@b0ss @MAHADI

    +2 5 months ago
  • Profile image
    121k MAHADI

    seriously? anime-girls dressed up like planes? unbelievable!!
    looks good but not so good performance...

    +4 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    I think you could put a precision bomb or something to take out the arctic base. But I made about 10 passes on the attic base and I did not get blown up.

    5 months ago
  • Profile image

    Please and Thank-you

    5 months ago
  • Profile image

    some criticism here. now, i'm not saying that i'm the best creator on this site (most of my planes are not really well done), but this thing is, first of all, unarmed (which is surprising, given the fact that most of your builds have good custom weapons), second, it's flight controls are horrible (it handles like a giant WW2 bomber that doesn't have ailerons and thus can only use yaw to somehow turn), and lastly, it has a clickbait preview: the product on the cover is different from what we got. i'm not saying that this is bad, but it's a bit disappointing, given the fact that your other builds are well-made.

    +6 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    Please SU-35

    +1 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ReignSUPREME What is your next build?

    5 months ago
  • Profile image
    3,219 WSI

    ahh yes, nothing like a good ol russian fighter jet.

    5 months ago
  • Profile image

    I see. Thank you for advice@matickrmelj

    +1 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    thx:)@232287168147825

    +1 5 months ago
  • Profile image
    Mod Blue0Bull

    this aint it chief

    +4 5 months ago
  • Profile image
    4,456 Grandma

    Hey, Dont use this in MP! 728 parts is not okie dokie for MP, Lower than 600 is fine

    +1 5 months ago
  • Profile image
    12.4k Krmo

    This build would have been fantastic if it wasnt ruined by actual performance. Looks great to be honest.

    5 months ago
  • Profile image
    12.4k Krmo

    You should have probably incresed the AoA of this plane. (I thought it has an all flying tail) And also, the t/w is way too high. The IRL version has a T/W of about 1.1, yours has a T/W of about 8 . At takeoff the plane was pulling 8G (rip pilot), when in turns it managed way less than that.

    5 months ago
  • Profile image

    Yes, I think I did a little too soon@NANOMAN

    5 months ago
  • Profile image
    119k RussianAce

    @NANOMAN +

    +2 5 months ago
  • Profile image

    Like the pictures!

    5 months ago
  • Log in to see more comments