Profile image

ARCCS-2

40.2k randomusername  2 months ago

This is my second aircraft carrier. This is mobile friendly and should not lag any device. While it has no arresting hook, it should be easy to land on. This aircraft carrier was designed with one thing in mind, mobile-friendliness. Since most aircraft carriers on SP are not mobile friendly and or work being 50,000 US tons, I decided to make one that did work. 104 parts and wickedly fast loading times.
.

Stats:

  • Weighs 50,000 US tons.
  • 40 mph top speed.
  • Turn time of around 180 seconds (Really fast)
  • 0-40 mph in 40 seconds.
  • Decent armor.

    Misc:

  • ARCCS-2 means Aircraft carrier start 2.

    Controls:

  • VTOL for engines

  • Roll to steer.



    Enjoy.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +63 bonus
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 396.2ft (120.8m)
  • Length 1527.3ft (465.5m)
  • Height 170.4ft (51.9m)
  • Empty Weight -4,734,385lbs (-2,147,483kg)
  • Loaded Weight -4,734,385lbs (-2,147,483kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading 29.0lbs/ft2 (141.7kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 3,444,792.4ft2 (320,032.0m2)
  • Drag Points 0

Parts

  • Number of Parts 104
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    ARCCS-1 is in my files and didn't turn that well so I decided that I will not post it, @BLOODIUS.

    15 days ago
  • Profile image
    1,232 BLOODIUS

    where is your first aircraft carrier?

    +1 25 days ago
  • Profile image

    I landed the bushplane on it, @hellgaming, It's tested and it works. If there is something wrong, it's your plane's gear. disableAircraftCollisions must be false.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @randomusername its bulit correctly ( i think)and i used the default landing gear in the inventory not custom

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @hellgaming Your plane needs to be built correctly. The wheels need to have collisions enabled.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @randomusername U mind tellling me why does the landing gear goes through the deck and make it unable to take off

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    I scale it up when it's done, @Vortex1

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    381 Vortex1

    how do you build something so big that doesn't fit the builder screen?

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    1,741 ChisP

    Well I know that’s the xml but what I’m saying is that it probably calculates drag points with weight somehow@randomusername

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    CalculateDrag, @ChisP

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,741 ChisP

    Huh is it cause the weight? Cause that’s probably it.@randomusername

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Not a single part, big or small, it doesn't matter, @ChisP

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,741 ChisP

    Not even one of the smaller parts?@randomusername

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Any singular part that has drag would have been the end for the project.
    I use the Samsung Tab 3 to build, and the Acer Chromebook 11 to tune my builds. @ChisP

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,741 ChisP

    What do you have? you can also try smaller fractions btw@randomusername

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    My device certainly didn't think that, @ChisP
    Any drag on big builds causes my game to crash.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,741 ChisP

    I’ve been experimenting with drag physics in sp I found that having about half the drag points on the design will limit drag but retain most physics if you ever do a re-launch think of doing that. You probably don’t have to worry about the drag effects on this build though since it’s only 104 parts@randomusername

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Wow it doesn’t kill my computer

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    9,204 Rub3n213

    Clever build nice work

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Hot

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Yes, @Jim1the1Squid

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Ahh, so I appears you operate on a Chromebook...

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ThatOneF15Eagle
    Mega F

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Blame SP for limiting maximum wing effectiveness @Jim1the1Squid
    Don't blame me, this aircraft carrier is pushing the boundaries of SP physics.
    My previous attempts were absolute failers and drifted hundreds of miles and broke the sound barrier within an hour.
    .
    When you are careful or slow down when you turn, you never have to drift, it can turn on the spot. In fact, it is designed to turn on the spot. Unrealistic? Oh yeah. But hey, it works!

    +1 2 months ago
  • Log in to see more comments