Profile image

Lockheed Constellation

26.1k Kentheman  1.4 years ago

Yeah, if you liked it, upvoting it, thanks and enjoy! ;)

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 162.0ft (49.4m)
  • Length 133.6ft (40.7m)
  • Height 38.3ft (11.7m)
  • Empty Weight 156,861lbs (71,151kg)
  • Loaded Weight 229,626lbs (104,157kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.293
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.026
  • Wing Loading 52.6lbs/ft2 (256.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 4,368.5ft2 (405.9m2)
  • Drag Points 67897

Parts

  • Number of Parts 338
  • Control Surfaces 12
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    Np! @Kentheman

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.1k Kentheman

    Thanks for telling me, I never knew that :) @BoeyingOfficial

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    It’s just lockheed constellation. Lockheed’s name changed to Lockheed Martin after merging with Martin Marietta in 1995. And since the connie came from the 40’s/50’s you just call it the Lockheed Constellation. Other than that, nice plane!

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Not quite a 1:1 ratio, but she's got the look. Beautiful job.

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.1k Kentheman

    Ok @CoolPeach @EternalDarkness @doge

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.1k doge

    I don't care what anyone says
    It's great 9.5/10
    Pros great compromise between
    Look and partcount
    Scaled correctly
    Looks nice
    Cons
    tsad tag
    Line could use more details clunky lookin nose
    Underpowered @EternalDarkness

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    This build would have scored better if there wasn't TSAD tag on it. People have grew to expect a certain level of quality (read "very high level of quality") from TSAD, and this simply doesn't do it. You need custom control surfaces, and you need to clean up the area around the cockpit. I know you can do it.

    P.S. Engines are underpowered.

    +5 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    40.6k CoolPeach

    This is pretty decent, but not astounding. The wings shouldn’t curve towards the tips, their built at an equal and constant dihedral. Also, I don’t know why, but you never seem to cover up the root of the wings so that you don’t get a weird gap between the fusalage and the wing. The plane, though possibly scaled correctly, is way too large in every dimension for 1:1 scale. The vertical stabilisers are also quite odd in terms of the way they’ve been built and modeled, they should be resembling almost a circle and be curved all the way through, instead they’re far too blocky, triangly and edgy. The clipping control surfaces is also simply disappointing for someone who is clearly capable of much more. The strips are also really poorly constructed, I’m not sure how you decided to build them, but one could of easily taken a single fusalage and copied the specific angle of that cylinders side, resulting in a much cleaner result. Overall, this plane is mediocre, I’d really, honestly expect better from someone like you and your relationship to TSAD. Ask yourself, is this plane built to that sort of level? Please take the criticism on board and improve, we’re all here to get better, one way or another.
    P.S. At least include some description and not just some cliché “like, subscribe and share” statement.

    +7 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Ooooooffff@QingyuZhou @Kentheman

    +3 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.1k Kentheman

    None of ur business @QingyuZhou

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.5k Sunnyskies

    That's a nice Connie!

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.7k CRJ900Pilot

    Cool!

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    156k QingyuZhou

    Don't beg for upvotes bro

    +9 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,335 Rhombus

    You don’t see many of these in the site

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,179 Hooded

    TWA logo maybe?

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    May I build President Eisenhower's Air Force One with this?

    1.4 years ago